OHBPC August 16, 1991

Can a law firm keep a retired or inactive attorney's name in the firm name, on its letterhead, or as of counsel?

Short answer: The opinion concluded that a firm may keep a retiring attorney's name in a long-established firm name even after the attorney takes retired or inactive registration status, and may list a retired-status attorney on letterhead if so designated, but may not list an inactive-status attorney on letterhead and may not call a retired-registration attorney 'of counsel.' This opinion interprets Ohio's former Code of Professional Responsibility and has since been withdrawn.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1991. Ezel answers yours: whether it's allowed on your facts, under the current Ohio Rules of Professional Conduct, with citations.

Currency note: this opinion is from 1991
Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later opinions or rule amendments may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.
Disclaimer: Advisory only. Not binding precedent.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official ethics opinion. The original opinion (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ethics opinion (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The Board answered four questions about how a firm may treat the name of a partner who retires and is granted "retired registration status" or "inactive registration status" by the Supreme Court of Ohio. The analysis ran through DR 2-101(A) (no misleading communication about professional status), EC 2-12 (a lawyer should be scrupulous in representing professional status), and DR 2-102(B), which lets a firm "use as, or continue to include in, its name the name or names of one or more deceased or retired members of the firm." The Board read DR 2-102(B)'s reference to "retired members" as not tied to any particular registration status, so a long-established firm name that already included the retiring attorney's name could keep it.

On letterhead, the Board followed Gov.Bar R. VI Section 3(B): a retired-status attorney may be listed if the name was on the letterhead before retirement and the listing designates the attorney as "retired." Because the Governing Bar Rules were silent on inactive-status attorneys, the Board advised that they may not be listed at all, consistent with its prior advice (Op. 91-1) that listing an inactive-status attorney is misleading because it suggests authorization to practice.

On "of counsel," the Board adopted the ABA's description (ABA Formal Op. 90-357) of a "close, regular, personal relationship." A retiring partner on active registration status could be "of counsel" if that relationship was maintained, but an attorney on retired registration status could not, because Gov.Bar R. VI Section 3(B) bars a retired attorney from being listed as "of counsel." The Board also concluded that a firm may keep in its name the name of a partner who becomes "of counsel," consistent with ABA Formal Op. 90-357 and opinions from Vermont and Virginia.

Currency note

The Ohio Board of Professional Conduct withdrew this opinion by Board action on August 7, 2020 in Opinion 2020-07, and the Board's status list also notes it was modified by Opinion 96-3 on April 12, 1996. This opinion issued in 1991 under Ohio's former Code of Professional Responsibility (superseded by the Ohio Rules of Professional Conduct effective February 1, 2007). The registration-status rules it applies (Gov.Bar R. VI) have also been amended since. Treat this page as historical context, not current guidance. Verify against the current Ohio Rules of Professional Conduct and the current Rules for the Government of the Bar before relying on any specific rule mentioned here.

Common questions

Q: Can a firm keep a retired partner's name in the firm name?

A: Under this opinion, yes, if the name was in the firm name before the partner retired; the Board read DR 2-102(B) to permit a long-established firm name to continue to include the name of a retired member even after the partner takes retired or inactive registration status.

Q: Can a retired attorney be listed on the firm's letterhead?

A: The opinion concluded that a retired-registration attorney may be listed if the name was on the letterhead before retirement and the listing designates the attorney as "retired" (Gov.Bar R. VI Section 3(B)); an inactive-registration attorney may not be listed at all.

Q: Can a retiring partner be "of counsel" to the firm?

A: The opinion concluded that a retiring partner on active registration status may be "of counsel" if a close, regular, personal relationship is maintained, but an attorney on retired registration status may not be held out as "of counsel."

Background and rules framework

The opinion interprets the former Code of Professional Responsibility DR 2-101(A) (no false or misleading communication about professional status), EC 2-12, and DR 2-102(B) (firm-name rule, including continued use of a deceased or retired member's name), read together with the Supreme Court of Ohio's Rules for the Government of the Bar, Gov.Bar R. III Section 2(A) and Gov.Bar R. VI Sections 2 and 3, which created retired and inactive registration status effective September 1, 1991.

Citations and references

Rules of Professional Responsibility (Ohio, former):

  • DR 2-101(A), no misleading communication about professional status
  • DR 2-102(B), firm-name rule; continued use of a retired member's name
  • EC 2-12, scrupulous representation of professional status

Rules for the Government of the Bar (Ohio):

  • Gov.Bar R. III Section 2(A), names of legal professional associations
  • Gov.Bar R. VI Sections 2 and 3, retired and inactive registration status

Other opinions cited:

  • ABA Formal Op. 90-357 (1990): the meaning of "of counsel"
  • Ohio Sup.Ct. Op. 91-1 (1991): listing inactive-status attorneys is misleading
  • Vermont Bar Ass'n Op. 83-7 (1983); Virginia State Bar Op. 660 (1985): firm names including "of counsel" members

See also

Source

Original opinion text

Reproduced from the official source for research purposes. The linked source is authoritative.

The Supreme Court of Ohio
BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ON GRIEVANCES AND DISCIPLINE
41 SOUTH HIGH STREET-SUITE 3370, COLUMBUS, OH 43215-6105
(614) 644-5800 FAX: (614) 644-5804

OFFICE OF SECRETARY

OPINION 91-18
Issued August 16, 1991
Withdrawn by Adv. Op. 2020-07

[CPR Opinion-provides advice under the Ohio Code of Professional Responsibility which is superseded by the Ohio Rules of Professional Conduct, eff. 2/1/2007.]

[Modified- by Opinion 96-3 on April 12, 1996]

SYLLABUS: A firm name may continue to include in its name, the name of a retiring attorney granted "retired registration status" or "inactive registration status," if included in the firm name prior to the attorney being granted "retired registration status" or "inactive registration status." DR 2-102 (B).

A law firm may list on its letterhead the name of an attorney granted "retired registration status" if the name was included prior to the time the attorney is granted "retired registration status," and provided that the letterhead includes a designation that the attorney is "retired." Gov.Bar R. VI § 3 (B). Attorneys with "inactive registration status" may not be listed on a firm's letterhead. Gov.Bar R. VI § 2.

A retiring partner who has "active registration status" with the Supreme Court of Ohio may be "of counsel" to the firm so long as the partner maintains a "close, regular, personal relationship" with the firm and remains on "active registration status." However, a retiring partner who has "retired registration status" with the Supreme Court of Ohio may not be of counsel." Gov.Bar R. VI § 3(B).

A law firm may continue to include in its firm name, the name of a retiring partner of the firm who becomes "of counsel" to the firm. DR 2-102 (B).

OPINION: Four questions are presented as follows:

  1. Whether a firm may continue to include in its name the name of a retiring partner who is granted "retired registration status" or the name of a retiring partner who is granted "inactive registration status;"

  2. Whether it is proper for a law firm to list on its letterhead the names of attorneys granted "retired registration status" or "inactive registration status;"

  3. Whether a retiring partner can become "of counsel" to a firm;

  4. Whether a law firm may continue to include in its name the name of a retiring partner who becomes "of counsel" to the firm.

Question 1

An attorney who is granted "retired registration status" or an attorney who is granted "inactive registration status" by the Supreme Court of Ohio must abide by the following restrictions:

[Attorneys with retired registration status and attorneys with inactive registration status] shall not be entitled to practice law in Ohio; hold himself [herself] out as authorized to practice law in Ohio; hold judicial office in Ohio; render any legal service for an attorney granted active status; occupy a position in this state in which he [she] is called upon to give legal advice or counselor to examine the law or pass upon the legal effect of any act, document, or law; be employed in the Ohio judicial system in a position required to be held by an attorney; or practice before any court or agency of this state on behalf of any person except himself [herself].

Gov.Bar R. VI §2 and §3 (adopted June 4, 1991, effective September 1, 1991).

Under DR 2-101 (A) of the Code of Professional Responsibility (Code) any communication by a lawyer regarding his or her professional status shall not contain any misleading statement or claim. Ethical Consideration 2-12 warns that in order to avoid the possibility of misleading persons with whom he [she] deals, a lawyer should be scrupulous in the representation of his [her] professional status. The Supreme Court of Ohio provides rules regarding firm names, in an effort to prevent misleading communication. For example, names of legal professional associations must be in compliance with Governing Bar Rule III, Section 2 (A). Further, the Code contains a rule which governs all firm names. Disciplinary Rule 2-102 (B) states in part that:

[a] lawyer in private practice shall not practice under a trade name, a name that is misleading as to the identity of the lawyer or lawyers practicing under such name, or a firm name containing names other than those of one or more of the lawyers in the firm, except that the name of a professional corporation or professional association or legal clinic may contain "P.C." or "P.A." or similar symbols indicating the nature of the organization, and if otherwise lawful a firm may use as, or continue to include in, its name the name or names of one or more deceased or retired members of the firm or of a predecessor firm in a continuing line of succession.

Code of Professional Responsibility DR 2-102 (B).

This rule was written prior to there being a "retired registration status;" and thus, the reference in Disciplinary Rule 2-102 (B) to retired members of the firm is not to be interpreted as referring to a particular registration status. With this in mind, it is clear from DR 2-102 (B) that a firm may use or continue to use the name or names of one or more retired members of the firm. Where a firm name is long established, the continued use in the firm name of a name of a retiring partner complies with the rules and is not misleading. Thus, it is the opinion of this Board that if an attorney is retiring and the name of the attorney was included in the firm name prior to his or her retiring, then the name can continue to be used in the firm name even if the retiring attorney acquires "retired registration status" or "inactive registration status."

Question 2

Governing Bar Rule VI § 3 (B) (adopted June 4, 1991, effective September 1, 1991) sets forth that "[a] law firm may include the name of a retired attorney on its letterhead if the name was included prior to the time the attorney is granted retired status, provided the letterhead includes a designation that the attorney is 'retired."' Therefore, if an attorney is granted "retired registration status" and is listed on firm letterhead, the attorney must be listed as "retired." This designation is necessary to avoid misleading the public.

The Governing Bar Rules are silent as to the listing of an attorney with "inactive registration status" on firm letterhead. Thus, this Board advises that attorneys with "inactive registration status" may not be listed on a firm's letterhead. This advice is consistent with previous advice by the Board that the listing in a law list or directory of retiring partners who have acquired "inactive registration status" is misleading in that it gives the appearance that the "inactive registration status" attorneys are authorized to practice law. Ohio Sup.Ct, Op. 91-1 (1991).

Question 3

Some confusion exists as to what "of counsel" means. The Code of Professional Responsibility does not define "of counsel." However, the American Bar Association Standing Committee on Ethics and Professional Responsibility has clarified the meaning of "of counsel" status. ABA Formal Op. 90-357 (1990). Four principal patterns of the "of counsel" relationship were described: the part-time practitioners, who have changed from a full-time to a part-time career; the retired partners from the firm, who want to remain associated with the firm and be available for consultation; the probationary partners-to-be, who are brought into the firm laterally with the expectation of becoming a partner in a short period of time; and those with a permanent status as "of counsel," who have the quality of tenure, or something close to it, but lack the expectation of promotion to full partner status. Id. The core characteristic of the title "of counsel" is a "close, regular, personal relationship, describing a relationship which is neither that of partner nor the status ordinarily conveyed by the term "associate." Id. This Board supports the ABA clarification of the "of counsel" relationship.

Consistent with the ABA opinion, this Board has previously advised that a close, regular, personal relationship of a retired or semiretired former partner who remains available to the firm for consultation and advice could hold "of counsel" status. Ohio Sup.Ct, Op. 90-03 (1990) and Op. 88-23 (1988). It is still the opinion of this Board that a retiring partner may become "of counsel" so long as he or she maintains a "close, regular, personal relationship" with the firm and remains on "active registration status" with the Supreme Court of Ohio. However, this advice is not applicable if the attorney registers for "retired registration status" with the Supreme Court of Ohio. Under recent rule changes, an attorney in Ohio who is registered under "retired status" must comply with Governing Bar Rule VI § 3 (A) and (B), adopted June 4, 1991, effective September 1, 1991 for purposes of creating a "retired registration status." Under Governing Bar Rule VI § 3(B), "[a] retired attorney [meaning retired registration status] shall not be listed as 'of counsel' or otherwise be represented as being able to engage in the practice of law."

Question 4

Where a firm name is long established, the continued use in the firm name of a name of a partner who becomes "of counsel" is not misleading. Therefore, the opinion of this Board is that the name of a partner who becomes "of counsel" to the firm may be continued to be used in the firm name. This advice is consistent with ABA, Formal Op. 90-357 (1990); Vermont Bar Ass'n, Op. 83-7 (1983); and Virginia State Bar, Op. 660 (1985).

Advisory Opinions of the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline are informal, nonbinding opinions in response to prospective or hypothetical questions regarding the application of the Supreme Court Rules for the Government of the Bar of Ohio, the Supreme Court Rules for the Government of the Judiciary, the Code of Professional Responsibility, the Code of Judicial Conduct, and the Attorney's Oath of Office.

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 1991 opinion on this question. Ezel checks the current Ohio Rules of Professional Conduct and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the rules it relies on.