OHBPC September 25, 1987

Under former Canon 7B(2) of the Ohio Code of Judicial Conduct, how early could a candidate for judicial office begin fund-raising for primary and general elections?

Short answer: The Board read former Canon 7B(2) to permit a judicial-campaign committee to solicit funds no earlier than 120 days before each election in which the candidate participated; a primary candidate could not begin earlier than 120 days before the primary date, and a candidate participating only in the general election could not begin earlier than 120 days before the general election date. The opinion was withdrawn by Board action on December 5, 1997 due to Canon 7 amendments.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1987. Ezel answers yours: whether it's allowed on your facts, under the current Ohio Rules of Professional Conduct, with citations.

Currency note: this opinion is from 1987
Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later opinions or rule amendments may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.
Disclaimer: Advisory only. Not binding precedent.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official ethics opinion. The original opinion (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ethics opinion (PDF)

Currency note

The Board's status list flags this opinion as Withdrawn by Board action on December 5, 1997 due to Canon 7 amendments. The opinion was issued under the former Ohio Code of Judicial Conduct, which was superseded by the current Ohio Code of Judicial Conduct effective March 1, 2009. Treat this page as historical context, not current guidance. The current Ohio rules on judicial campaign fund-raising should be consulted before acting.

Plain-English summary

The Board addressed a request for interpretation of former Canon 7B(2), which provided that "[a] candidate's committee may solicit funds for his campaign no earlier than 120 days before a primary election and no later than 120 days after the last election in which he participates during the election year." The Board began by anchoring the term "candidate" in former R.C. 3501.01(H), which covered qualified persons certified for placement on a primary, general, or special election ballot, as well as duly qualified write-in candidates.

The Board read the 120-day window as a per-election limit applicable separately to each election in which the candidate participated, not as a single annual window keyed to a statewide primary. The Board reasoned that if candidates could begin soliciting funds 120 days before a statewide May primary that they were not participating in, year-round fund-raising would result and the intent of Canon 7B(2) would be defeated.

The Board cited the Reporter's Notes for the proposition that the framers' purpose was that "the securing of campaign funds or pledges cannot be carried on throughout the year" (Thode, Reporter's Notes 99 (1973)). Accordingly, the Board concluded that fund-raising for judicial campaigns should commence no earlier than 120 days before each election in which the candidate participated.

Common questions

Q: Could a candidate participating only in the general election begin fund-raising 120 days before the primary?

A: No. The Board read the 120-day window as per-election; a candidate not on the primary ballot could not begin earlier than 120 days before the general election date.

Q: Did the Board treat opposed, unopposed, and write-in candidates differently?

A: No. The Board read the rule as applying to opposed, unopposed, and duly qualified write-in candidates alike, with the start date keyed to each election in which they participated.

Q: Why was the opinion withdrawn?

A: The Board's status list states the opinion was withdrawn by Board action on December 5, 1997 due to Canon 7 amendments. The 1987 opinion does not analyze the post-amendment framework.

Citations and references

Rules of Judicial Conduct:

  • Former Canon 7B(2), Ohio Code of Judicial Conduct

Statutes:

  • R.C. 3501.01(H) (Baldwin 1987): definition of "candidate"

Other authorities:

  • E.W. Thode, Reporter's Notes to Code of Judicial Conduct, 99 (1973)

See also

Source

Original opinion text

Reproduced from the official source for research purposes. The linked source is authoritative.

The Supreme Court of Ohio
BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ON GRIEVANCES AND DISCIPLINE
41 SOUTH HIGH STREET-SUITE 3370, COLUMBUS, OH 43215-6105
(614) 644-5800 FAX: (614) 644-5804

OFFICE OF SECRETARY

OPINION 87-037
Issued: September 25, 1987

[Withdrawn- by Board on Dec. 5, 1997 due to Canon 7 amendments]

SYLLABUS: Under Canon 7B(2) of the Code of Judicial Conduct, a candidate for judicial office, through a fund-raising committee, may solicit funds for his or her campaign no earlier than 120days before each election in which he or she participates. Therefore, a candidate in the primary election may not commence the solicitation of funds earlier than 120 days prior to the date of that primary election. Likewise, a candidate in the general election may not commence the solicitation of funds earlier than 120 days prior to the date of the general election.

OPINION: We have before us your request for our interpretation of Canon 7B (2) of the Code of Judicial Conduct. Specifically, your request relates to when a candidate for judicial office may begin fund-raising.

It is important, for purposes of our discussion, to understand the meaning of the term "candidate." Under the Ohio law, a candidate is defined as "any qualified person certified in accordance with the provisions of the Revised Code for placement on the official ballot of the primary, general, or special election to be held in this state, or any qualified person who represents himself to be a write-in candidate, or who knowingly assents to such representation by another at either a primary, general, or special election to be held in this state." Ohio Rev. Code 3501.01(H) (Baldwin 1987).

The provision in the Code of Judicial Conduct relating to fund-raising in judicial campaigns states: "[a] candidate's committee may solicit funds for his campaign no earlier than 120 days before a primary election and no later than 120 days after the last election in which he participates during the election year." Code of Judicial Conduct, Canon 7B(2).

We believe that this 120-day rule permits candidates for judicial office, through their fund-raising committee, to commence their fund-raising activities 120 days prior to each election in which they participate as a candidate. This includes primary and general elections. Those participating in an election include opposed, unopposed and write-in candidates which are duly qualified and certified in accordance with the provisions of the Revised Code. Therefore, if the candidate is participating in a May 5th primary, he or she may not commence fund-raising any earlier than 120 days prior to May 5th. If, on the other hand, the candidate is participating only in the general election in November, then the candidate's fund-raising may not commence any earlier than 120 days prior to the general election date in November.

The framers of the Code enacted a time limitation on fund-raising, to be determined by the enacting jurisdiction, so that "the securing of campaign funds or pledges cannot be carried on throughout the year." E. W. Thode, Reporter's Notes to Code of Judicial Conduct 99 (1973). If candidates were permitted to solicit funds, through their committees, 120 days prior to the statewide May 5th primary election that they were not participating in, year-round fund-raising would result and the intent and purpose of Canon 7B(2) would be defeated.

Therefore, based on the foregoing, it is our opinion, and you are so advised, that fund-raising for judicial campaigns should commence no earlier than 120 days before each election in which the candidate participates.

This is an informal, non-binding advisory opinion, based upon the facts as presented and limited to questions arising under the Code of Judicial Conduct.

James W. Mason, Esq.
Secretary
Board of Commissioners
on Grievances and Discipline

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 1987 opinion on this question. Ezel checks the current Ohio Rules of Professional Conduct and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the rules it relies on.