NYSBA 2012-09-07

Can a New York lawyer put a photo on a business card and list recommended plumbers, realtors, or accountants on it?

Short answer: Yes; a photo of the lawyer is permitted (an actor portraying a lawyer must be disclosed), and the lawyer may list recommended service providers if a disclaimer makes clear there is no affiliation or referral agreement with them.
Currency note: this opinion is from 2012
Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later opinions or rule amendments may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.
Disclaimer: Advisory only. Not binding precedent.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official ethics opinion. The original opinion (linked at the bottom of this page) is the authoritative source for any reliance.

NY State Bar Ethics Opinion 932: Photos and recommended providers on a lawyer's business card

Short answer: A lawyer's business card may include the lawyer's photograph, and the lawyer may list other service providers (such as a plumber, realtor, or accountant) on the card or a separate sheet, provided an appropriate disclaimer makes clear the lawyer has no referral agreement with them.

Disclaimer: This is an advisory ethics opinion. Advisory opinions are not binding; they interpret the New York State Bar Association's rules of professional conduct and are persuasive authority. This summary is for research purposes only and is not legal advice. Verify current rules before acting on any specific guidance.

About this page: The plain-English summary and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official opinion. We do not reproduce the opinion text on this page; follow the linked source for the official text, which controls.

View original opinion

Plain-English summary

The committee was asked whether a lawyer's business card may carry the lawyer's photograph, and whether the lawyer may list on the back of the card or a separate sheet other service providers, such as a plumber, realtor, mortgage loan officer, or accountant, useful to clients in a real estate transaction and recommended from the lawyer's own past experience.

On the photograph, the opinion notes that Rule 7.5(a)(i) gives a non-exclusive list of what a card may contain (name, identification as a lawyer, address, telephone numbers, firm name, Rule 7.4 practice-area information, and names of members and associates) and concludes that nothing in the Rules prohibits a photograph or headshot. The opinion adds one limit drawn from Rule 7.1(c)(3): a lawyer may not use an actor to portray a lawyer in the photograph without disclosing that fact, and the card may contain nothing false, misleading, or deceptive under Rules 7.5(a) and 7.1(a).

On listing other providers, the opinion reads Rules 5.4 and 7.2 as contemplating that lawyers may refer clients to other providers and receive referrals, while requiring the lawyer to keep professional independence so the client receives the lawyer's best judgment free of undue influence. The opinion states that exclusive reciprocal referral arrangements are prohibited (Rule 7.2, Comment [4]) and that the lawyer must not have such an interest in a steady stream of referrals that it undermines professional judgment. Nonexclusive arrangements are permitted if the client is informed, so the listed referrals should carry a disclaimer that the lawyer has no agreement with the listed providers; the opinion offers a sample disclaimer noting the providers are not affiliated with the law office and may not be appropriate in every matter. The committee expressly declined to opine on the constitutionality of the advertising rules.

In practice

Under this opinion, and under the New York rules as they stood at the time, a lawyer's business card may carry the lawyer's own photograph, and a card or attached sheet may recommend other professionals. The opinion conditions the recommendation list on a disclaimer disclaiming any affiliation or referral agreement, on the arrangement being nonexclusive, and on the lawyer not letting a referral stream compromise independent judgment. A photograph that uses an actor to depict a lawyer must disclose that.

Common questions

Q: Can a New York lawyer put a photo on a business card?

A: Yes. The opinion concludes that nothing in the Rules prohibits a lawyer's photograph or headshot on a business card.

Q: Can the lawyer list a plumber, realtor, or accountant the lawyer recommends?

A: Yes, with a disclaimer. The opinion permits listing recommended providers on the card or a separate sheet provided the list states the lawyer has no agreement with them; the opinion supplies a sample disclaimer.

Q: Are reciprocal referral arrangements with those providers allowed?

A: Exclusive reciprocal referral arrangements are prohibited under Rule 7.2, Comment [4]. Nonexclusive arrangements are permitted if the client is informed and the referral interest does not undermine the lawyer's professional judgment.

Q: Can the photo show an actor instead of the lawyer?

A: Only with disclosure. The opinion states, under Rule 7.1(c)(3), that a lawyer may not use an actor to portray a lawyer without disclosing that fact.

Background and rules framework

The opinion applies Rule 7.5(a)(i) (Model Rule 7.5), listing permissible business-card content, together with Rule 7.1 (Model Rule 7.1) on truthful, non-misleading communications, including the Rule 7.1(c)(3) disclosure requirement for a depicted actor. The referral analysis rests on Rule 7.2 (Model Rule 7.2) and its Comment [4], and on Rule 5.4 (Model Rule 5.4) on professional independence.

Citations and references

Rules of Professional Conduct:

  • MR 7.5 / NY 7.5(a)(i) (business-card content)
  • MR 7.1 / NY 7.1(a), 7.1(c)(3) (truthful communications; disclosure of an actor)
  • MR 7.2 / NY 7.2 and Comment [4] (referrals; reciprocal-referral limits)
  • MR 5.4 / NY 5.4 (professional independence)

Other opinions cited:

  • N.Y. State 765 (2003): a lawyer's interest in a referral stream must not undermine professional judgment

See also

Source