NYSBA 2024-04-23

Can a lawyer pass the credit card merchant processing fee on to a client who pays legal fees by credit card?

Short answer: Yes. The opinion concludes a lawyer may pass a merchant processing fee on to a client as an expense if both the legal fee and the processing fee are reasonable and the lawyer explained the charge and obtained the client's consent in advance.
Disclaimer: Advisory only. Not binding precedent.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official ethics opinion. The original opinion (linked at the bottom of this page) is the authoritative source for any reliance.

NYSBA Ethics Opinion 1258A: Charging the Client the Credit Card Processing Fee

Short answer: The opinion concludes that a lawyer may pass a merchant processing fee on to clients who pay legal fees by credit card, provided both the legal fee and the processing fee are reasonable and the lawyer has explained the additional charge to the client and obtained the client's consent in advance. This opinion withdraws N.Y. State 1258.

Disclaimer: This is an advisory ethics opinion. Advisory opinions are not binding; they interpret the New York State Bar Association's view of New York's Rules of Professional Conduct and are persuasive authority. This summary is for research purposes only and is not legal advice. Verify current rules before acting on any specific guidance.

About this page: The plain-English summary and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official opinion. We do not reproduce the opinion text on this page; follow the linked source for the official text, which controls.

Plain-English summary

The inquirer accepts credit card payments for legal services and is charged a merchant processing fee of roughly 3.5% to 3.75% of the invoiced amount. The question is whether the lawyer may pass that fee on to the client as an expense.

The opinion applies Rule 1.5(a), which prohibits charging an excessive fee or expense, and treats a merchant processing fee charged back to a client as an "expense" within the meaning of that rule. The opinion notes that Rule 1.5(b) requires the lawyer to advise the client in writing of the fees and expenses for which the client will be responsible. Drawing on N.Y. State 1050 (2015), the opinion concludes that nothing prohibits a lawyer from increasing the invoiced amount by the merchant processing fee, provided the lawyer complies with Rule 1.5. The opinion notes that N.Y. State 1050 also allowed a nominal up-charge to cover the processing fee imposed on the up-charge itself, subject to disclosure, advance consent, and overall reasonableness, and concludes the same principles apply to processing fees on legal fees paid after the advance retainer.

The opinion observes that other states' bars have reached similar conclusions (Illinois Op. 14-01 and D.C. Op. 348), and states that whether the up-charge complies with General Business Law section 518.1, as amended, is a question of law beyond its jurisdiction.

In practice

Under this opinion, a lawyer may charge a client the credit card merchant processing fee as an expense if the legal fee and the processing fee are both reasonable, the lawyer explains the charge to the client, and the client consents in advance, with the fees and expenses stated in writing as Rule 1.5(b) requires. Per the opinion, whether the up-charge complies with General Business Law section 518.1 is a question of law the committee does not decide.

Common questions

Q: Can a lawyer add the credit card processing fee to the client's bill?

A: Per the opinion, yes, as an expense, if the legal fee and the processing fee are reasonable and the lawyer explained the charge and obtained the client's consent in advance.

Q: Does the processing fee count as a "fee" or an "expense" under the rules?

A: Per the opinion, it is an "expense" within the meaning of Rule 1.5(a), and Rule 1.5(b) requires the lawyer to state the fees and expenses for which the client is responsible in writing.

Q: Can the lawyer add a little more than the actual processing cost?

A: Per the opinion, a nominal up-charge over the actual processing fees is permitted, as recognized in N.Y. State 1050, if the client is told of it and consents before it is imposed and the total charged is reasonable.

Background and rules framework

The opinion interprets New York Rule 1.5(a) (no excessive fee or expense) and Rule 1.5(b) (writing requirement for fees and expenses), which correspond to ABA Model Rule 1.5. The opinion treats General Business Law section 518.1 as a question of law it does not decide.

Citations and references

Rules of Professional Conduct:

  • New York Rules of Professional Conduct 1.5(a), 1.5(b)
  • ABA Model Rule 1.5 (analogue)

Statutes:

  • New York General Business Law section 518.1 (credit card surcharge disclosure; noted as a question of law)

Other opinions cited:

  • N.Y. State 1050 (2015): passing on credit card processing fees and a nominal up-charge
  • Illinois Op. 14-01 (2014); D.C. Op. 348 (2009): similar conclusions

See also

Source