Can a lawyer charge a client interest on unpaid legal fees, and at what rate?
Apply this to your situation
This page answers the general question as of 2000. Ezel answers yours: whether it's allowed on your facts, under the current New York Rules of Professional Conduct, with citations.
Plain-English summary
A lawyer asked whether she could ethically charge interest on unpaid fees where the retainer agreement expressly provided for it, and alternatively where the agreement was silent, and what rate could be charged. The Committee answered both questions favorably, with conditions.
Where the retainer agreement provides for interest, the Committee concluded, following N.Y. State 399 and ABA Formal Opinion 338, that it is not improper to charge interest when the lawyer fully informs the client of the circumstances in which interest may be charged, those circumstances, the fee, and the interest rate are reasonable, and the client consents. Where the agreement is silent, a question on which other states had divided, the Committee concluded a lawyer may still charge interest if the lawyer notifies the client of the intent to charge a reasonable rate and gives the client a reasonable opportunity to pay the outstanding balance before any interest accrues. It reasoned that the Code treats the client's obligation to pay as important, that placing lawyers on more equal footing with other interest-charging creditors serves EC 2-23's goal of avoiding fee disputes, and that New York case law already permits interest on an "account stated" even absent an express agreement.
On the rate, the Committee noted that under DR 2-106 a fee must not be illegal or excessive and must be reasonable; although interest compensates for delay rather than being part of the fee, the rate should meet the same reasonableness requirement and comply with all applicable laws, including usury laws. The Committee emphasized that the better practice is to address interest and all payment terms in a written retainer agreement at the inception of the engagement.
Currency note
This opinion was issued in 2000, before New York replaced the Code of Professional Responsibility (the Disciplinary Rules and Ethical Considerations cited here) with the New York Rules of Professional Conduct, effective April 1, 2009. The reasonable-fee requirement is now carried in New York Rule 1.5. Treat this page as historical context, not current guidance. Verify against current rules before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or requirement mentioned here.
Common questions
Q: Can a retainer agreement provide for interest on overdue fees?
A: Yes. The opinion concluded it is not improper for a retainer agreement to charge interest on unpaid fees when the lawyer fully informs the client of the circumstances, those circumstances and the fee and rate are reasonable, and the client consents.
Q: Can a lawyer charge interest if the retainer agreement says nothing about it?
A: Yes, with notice. The opinion concluded a lawyer may charge interest even where the agreement is silent if the lawyer notifies the client of the intent to charge a reasonable rate and gives the client a reasonable opportunity to pay before interest accrues.
Q: How high can the interest rate be?
A: The opinion concluded the rate must be reasonable, like the fee under DR 2-106, and must comply with all applicable laws, including usury laws.
Q: What does the committee recommend as the better practice?
A: The opinion stated that the better practice is to address all payment terms, including any interest on past-due bills, in a written retainer agreement entered into at the inception of the engagement.
Background and rules framework
The opinion interpreted New York's then-governing DR 2-106 (fees, requiring that a fee not be excessive and be reasonable, the analog of Model Rule 1.5), and noted DR 2-101(C)(3) on advertising credit arrangements as further support. The analysis turned on notice to the client and the reasonableness of the rate.
Citations and references
Rules of Professional Conduct (then in effect):
- DR 2-106 (fees must be reasonable, not excessive; analog of Model Rule 1.5)
- DR 2-101(C)(3) (advertising of credit arrangements)
Statutes:
- New York CPLR 5001 (prejudgment interest on a successful fee claim)
Other opinions cited:
- N.Y. State Bar Opinion 399 (1975): charging interest on delinquent accounts
- ABA Formal Opinion 338 (1974): charging interest with client notice and agreement
See also
- ABA Formal Op. 00-419: Credit Card Payment of Legal Fees
- ABA Formal Op. 484: Client Fee-Financing Companies
Source
- Landing page: https://www.nycbar.org/reports/formal-opinion-2000-2-charging-interest-on-unpaid-legal-fees/
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read a 2000 opinion on this question. Ezel checks the current New York Rules of Professional Conduct and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the rules it relies on.