May a Nebraska workers' compensation lawyer withhold client proceeds to repay a lawsuit-funding company?
Apply this to your situation
This page answers the general question as of 2013. Ask about yours and see what the current Nebraska Rules of Professional Conduct say for your facts, with citations.
Plain-English summary
An injured worker considered an advance from a lawsuit-funding company secured by part of anticipated workers' compensation benefits. The funder asked the worker's lawyer to withhold proceeds and pay the agreed amount when benefits arrived.
The threshold question was whether Neb. Rev. Stat. § 48-149's restrictions on assignment, attachment, or garnishment of workers' compensation benefits prohibited the proposed withholding. The Committee declined to interpret the statute because that legal question fell outside its advisory function.
The Committee instead assumed for its ethics analysis that the statute prohibited the withholding. The Rules' preamble requires lawyer conduct to conform to law and confines pursuit of a client's interests to lawful means.
Rule 1.2 gives the client authority over representation objectives, but only within legal and professional limits. If § 48-149 prohibits withholding the benefits, counsel must decline to honor the lien regardless of the client's wishes or counsel's view that the transaction serves the client's interests.
The opinion is expressly conditional. It does not determine whether the particular funding arrangement or lien actually violates § 48-149.
In practice
Under this opinion, the ethics result depends on the statute's application. Client direction cannot authorize counsel to perform a withholding that governing law forbids.
Common questions
Q: Did the Committee decide that § 48-149 prohibits the funding lien?
A: No. It declined to interpret the statute.
Q: What ethical conclusion did the Committee reach?
A: If the statute prohibits withholding the proceeds, the lawyer may not do it.
Q: Does the client's agreement change that conclusion?
A: No. Rule 1.2 makes client authority subject to legal and professional limits.
Q: What if the lawyer thinks the advance is in the client's interests?
A: That belief does not permit conduct prohibited by law.
Background and rules framework
Rule 1.2 allocates authority between client and lawyer while preserving limits imposed by law and professional obligations. The Rules' preamble likewise requires lawyer conduct to conform to law.
Citations and references
Nebraska Rules of Professional Conduct:
- Neb. R. Prof. C. § 3-501.2
Statutes:
- Neb. Rev. Stat. § 48-149
See also
- California Formal Op. 2020-204: Litigation funding
- Florida Ethics Op. 00-3: Nonrecourse litigation funding
- New York State Op. 1051: Fee from a litigation-funding advance
Source
- Landing page: Nebraska lawyer ethics opinions archive
- Original PDF: Nebraska Ethics Advisory Opinion 13-01
Original opinion text
Reproduced from the official source for research purposes. The linked source is authoritative.
NEBRASKA ETHICS ADVISORY OPINION FOR LAWYERS NO. 13-01
WHETHER OR NOT A NEBRASKA ATTORNEY MAY WITHHOLD A
PORTION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION PROCEEDS IN ORDER
TO HONOR A “LIEN” ON BEHALF OF A THIRD-PARTY WHO HAS
ADVANCED FUNDS TO THE CLIENT IS DEPENDENT ON AN
INTERPRETATION OF NEB. REV. STAT. §48-149. HOWEVER, IF
THE WITHHOLDING OF PROCEEDS DOES VIOLATE §48-149, A LAWYER MAY NOT ETHICALLY HONOR THE “LIEN.”
STATEMENT OF FACTS
A Nebraska attorney who represents an injured worker in a pending
workers compensation proceeding has requested an opinion regarding
whether honoring a potential agreement between the client and a third-party
“lawsuit funding company” would violate the Nebraska Rules of Professional
Conduct. Specifically, the attorney has indicated that the client was severely
injured during the course of his employment and has been unable to return to
work. As a result, the client has suffered significant financial hardship and
has sought the assistance of a third-party “lawsuit funding company” who
would provide advance funding to the client in anticipation of receiving a
portion of the client’s forthcoming workers compensation benefits.
A representative of the potential lender approached the attorney and
inquired whether the attorney would agree to withhold from the client a
portion of potential proceeds payable to the client if the client and lender
were able to reach an agreement as to the amount. The attorney expressed
concern that such an agreement would violate the general prohibition on the
assignment, attachment, or garnishment of workers compensation benefits
2965 found in Neb. Rev. Stat. §48-149 and sought assistance from the advisory
committee as to whether agreeing to withhold the funds would constitute an
ethical violation.
APPLICABLE RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT
The following rules of professional conduct are instructive with respect
to the question presented:
Preamble to Nebraska Rules of Professional Conduct, Paragraph 5:
A lawyer's conduct should conform to the requirements of the
law, both in professional service to clients and in the lawyer's
business and personal affairs. A lawyer should use the law's
procedures only for legitimate purposes and not to harass or
intimidate others. A lawyer should demonstrate respect for the
legal system and for those who serve it, including judges, other
lawyers and public officials. While it is a lawyer's duty, when
necessary, to challenge the rectitude of official action, it is also a
lawyer's duty to uphold legal process.
Preamble to Nebraska Rules of Professional Conduct, Paragraph 6:
As a public citizen, a lawyer should seek improvement of the
law, access to the legal system, the administration of justice and
the quality of service rendered by the legal profession. As a
member of a learned profession, a lawyer should cultivate
knowledge of the law beyond its use for clients, employ that
2966 knowledge in reform of the law and work to strengthen legal
education. In addition, a lawyer should further the public's
understanding of and confidence in the rule of law and the
justice system because legal institutions in a constitutional
democracy depend on popular participation and support to
maintain their authority. A lawyer should be mindful of
deficiencies in the administration of justice and of the fact that
the poor, and sometimes persons who are not poor, cannot afford
adequate legal assistance. Therefore, all lawyers should devote
professional time and resources and use civic influence to ensure
equal access to our system of justice for all those who because of
economic or social barriers cannot afford or secure adequate
legal counsel. A lawyer should aid the legal profession in
pursuing these objectives and should help the bar regulate itself
in the public interest.
Preamble to Nebraska Rules of Professional Conduct, Paragraph 9:
The Rules of Professional Conduct often prescribe terms for
resolving such conflicts. Within the framework of these Rules,
however, many difficult issues of professional discretion can
arise. Such issues must be resolved through the exercise of
sensitive professional and moral judgment guided by the basic
principles underlying the Rules. These principles include the
2967 lawyer's obligation zealously to protect and pursue a client's
legitimate interests, within the bounds of the law, while
maintaining a professional, courteous and civil attitude toward
all persons involved in the legal system.
§3-501.2: Scope of representation and allocation of authority between
client and lawyer.
(a) Subject to paragraphs (b), (c), (d), (e), and (f), a lawyer
shall abide by a client's decisions concerning the objectives of
representation and, as required by Rule 1.4 shall consult with
the client as to the means by which they are to be pursued. A
lawyer may take such action on behalf of the client as is
impliedly authorized to carry out the representation. A lawyer
shall abide by a client's decision whether to settle a matter. In a
criminal case, the lawyer shall abide by the client's decision,
after consultation with the lawyer, as to a plea to be entered,
whether to waive jury trial and whether the client will testify.
Comment 1: Paragraph (a) confers upon the client the ultimate
authority to determine the purposes to be served by legal
representation, within the limits imposed by law and the
lawyer's professional obligations.
2968
DISCUSSION
At the outset of this discussion, it must first be noted that the nature
of this request primarily turns on an interpretation of Neb. Rev. Stat. §48-
149—specifically, whether the statute prohibits an attorney from withholding
workers compensation benefits from the client as part of a contract between
the client and a third-party lender. The committee is of the opinion that this
question essentially calls for a legal interpretation which is outside of the
scope of the committee’s stated function. While the inability to provide
guidance as to the applicability of the statute may not result in a thoroughly
satisfactory opinion to the requesting attorney, this opinion will nevertheless
attempt to provide guidance to the requesting attorney by assuming
arguendo that §48-149 does prohibit an attorney from withholding workers
compensation proceeds from the client under the circumstances provided and
discussing what the attorney’s ethical responsibilities would therefore entail.
The committee is of the opinion that, if §48-149 does prohibit an
attorney from withholding workers compensation proceeds from a client in
order to ensure payment to a third-party lender, then the lawyer must refrain
from doing so even if the client desires the lawyer to do so and even if the
lawyer believes the arrangement to be in the client’s best interests. That is, a
fundamental underpinning of the Nebraska Rules of Professional Conduct is
that a lawyer must at all times conduct himself, and his representation of the
client, within the confines of the law. For example, Paragraph five (5) of the
2969
Preamble to the Nebraska Rules of Professional Conduct states that, “[a]
lawyer's conduct should conform to the requirements of the law, both in
professional service to clients and in the lawyer's business and personal
affairs.” Similarly, in Paragraph nine (9), the Preamble discusses the
fundamental ethical principle that a lawyer’s representation must, “zealously
. . . protect and pursue a client's legitimate interests, within the bounds of the
law . . . .” (Emphasis added). Finally, Rule 3-501.2, and its associated
Comment 1, specifies that a lawyer’s duty to the client is restrained by “the
limits imposed by law and the lawyer's professional obligations.”
In light of the foregoing, the requesting attorney in this instance must
at all times conduct himself within the confines of the law even if the client
requests him to do otherwise and even if the lawyer reasonably believes that
client would benefit from the potential contractual arrangement. To the
extent that Neb. Rev. Stat. §48-149 prohibits an attorney from withholding
workers compensation benefits from her client, then the attorney must not do
so irrespective of any agreement that may have been contemplated between
the client and a third-party lender. Again, however, this opinion is not to be
construed as an interpretation of §48-149 and its effect on the particular
factual scenario at issue.
CONCLUSION
Much of this request turns on the question of whether Neb. Rev. Stat.
§48-149 prohibits an attorney from withholding workers compensation
2970 proceeds from the client as part of a contractual obligation entered into
between the client and a third-party “lawsuit funding company.” While the
Committee cannot take a position on the applicability of the statute to the
circumstances at hand, it is clear that the lawyer must at all times conduct
his representation within the confines of the law. Accordingly, if §48-149
prohibits the lawyer from withholding workers compensation benefits from
the client under the particular scenario at hand, then the lawyer must not do
so even if the client desires the lawyer to do so and even if the lawyer believes
that the proposed contractual agreement would be in the best interests of the
client.
2971
What do the rules say today, for your facts?
This opinion is from 2013. Ezel checks the current Nebraska Rules of Professional Conduct against your situation and cites the rules it relies on.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace