May a Nebraska lawyer serve simultaneously as part-time county attorney in one county and chair of another county's mental health board?

Short answer Yes. Both roles act on behalf of Nebraska and do not create a concurrent conflict when performed in separate counties for different individuals, but the lawyer may not prosecute a petition before the mental health board the lawyer chairs.
Bar
NELAC
Issued
2012

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 2012. Ask about yours and see what the current Nebraska Rules of Professional Conduct say for your facts, with citations.

Currency note: this opinion is from 2012
Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later opinions or rule amendments may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.
Disclaimer: Advisory only. Not binding precedent.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official ethics opinion. The original opinion (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ethics opinion (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A part-time county attorney asked whether the lawyer also could chair the mental health board of a different county. County attorneys advocate for the state in civil and criminal matters, while mental health boards conduct hearings and adjudicate petitions alleging mental illness and dangerousness or dangerous-sex-offender status.

The roles differ in function. Before a mental health board, a county attorney advocates for Nebraska and bears the burden of proof. As board chair, the lawyer serves as a fact finder performing an adjudicative function for a state entity.

The Committee concludes that both roles act on behalf of the State of Nebraska. Even though defining a government lawyer's precise client can be difficult, the two roles do not create direct adversity or a material limitation on the facts presented, so Rule 1.7 does not bar the dual service.

Rule 3.8 contains no separate restriction addressing the arrangement, and the Committee finds no other Rule prohibiting the two offices.

The conclusion depends on separation of matters and counties. A lawyer could not prosecute a petition before the same mental health board the lawyer chairs, just as a judge could not prosecute a defendant appearing before the judge. The lawyer may perform the two functions only in different counties and in matters involving different individuals.

In practice

Under this opinion, the common state interest permits the dual public roles, but the lawyer must keep advocacy and adjudication separated by county, tribunal, and subject individual.

Common questions

Q: May a part-time county attorney chair another county's mental health board?

A: Yes. The Rules do not prohibit the dual service described.

Q: Why is there no concurrent conflict?

A: In both capacities the lawyer acts on behalf of Nebraska, and the matters are in separate counties involving different people.

Q: May the lawyer prosecute before the mental health board the lawyer chairs?

A: No. The lawyer cannot act as advocate and adjudicator in the same board proceeding.

Q: Does Rule 3.8 independently prohibit the arrangement?

A: No. The Committee finds nothing in the prosecutor-specific rule that addresses or bars the dual roles.

Q: Would the result cover the same person in both counties?

A: No. The holding is limited to cases in different counties that do not involve the same subject individuals.

Background and rules framework

Rules 1.7 and 1.11 govern concurrent conflicts for current government lawyers. Rule 1.13 informs the discussion of a government organization's identity as client, and Rule 3.8 defines prosecutor responsibilities.

Citations and references

Nebraska Rules of Professional Conduct:

  • Neb. R. Prof. C. §§ 3-501.7, 3-501.9, 3-501.11, 3-501.13, and 3-503.8

Statutes:

  • Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 23-1201(2) and 23-1206.01
  • Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 71-901 to 71-963, Mental Health Commitment Act
  • Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 71-1205, 71-1206, and 71-1209

See also

Source

Original opinion text

Reproduced from the official source for research purposes. The linked source is authoritative.

NEBRASKA ETHICS ADVISORY OPINION FOR LAWYERS No. 12-12

A LAWYER IS NOT PROHIBITED BY THE RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT FROM SIMULTANEOUSLY SERVING AS PART-TIME COUNTY ATTORNEY OF ONE NEBRASKA COUNTY AND AS CHAIR OF A MENTAL HEALTH BOARD OF ANOTHER NEBRASKA COUNTY.

QUESTION PRESENTED

WHICH RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT APPLY TO A LAWYER WHO SERVES AS AN ELECTED PART-TIME COUNTY ATTORNEY IN ONE COUNTY, AND AT THE SAME TIME SERVES AS AN APPOINTED CHAIR OF THE MENTAL HEALTH BOARD IN ANOTHER COUNTY?

FACTS
A lawyer asks whether he is disqualified by conflict of interest rules or any other rule of professional conduct from serving as the elected part-time county attorney in one Nebraska County, and at the same time serving as the appointed chair of the mental health board of another county.

APPLICABLE RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT

§ 3-501.11. Special conflicts of interest for former and current government officers and employees.

(d) Except as law may otherwise expressly permit, a lawyer currently serving as a public officer or employee:

(1) is subject to Rules 1.7 and 1.9; ….

2960
COMMENT
[1] A lawyer who has served or is currently serving as a public officer or employee is personally subject to the Rules of Professional Conduct including the prohibition against concurrent conflicts of interest stated in Rule 1.7. In addition, such a lawyer may be subject to statutes and government regulations regarding conflict of interest. Such statutes and regulations may circumscribe the extent to which the government agency may give consent under this Rule. See Rule 1.0(e) for the definition of informed consent.

§ 3-501.7. Conflict of interest; current clients.

(a) Except as provided in paragraph (b), a lawyer shall not represent a client if the representation involves a concurrent conflict of interest. A concurrent conflict of interest exists if: (1) the representation of one client will be directly adverse to another client; or (2) there is a significant risk that the representation of one or more clients will be materially limited by the lawyer's responsibilities to another client, a former client or a third person or by a personal interest of the lawyer.…

§ 3-503.8. Special responsibilities of a prosecutor.

The prosecutor in a criminal case shall:

(a) refrain from prosecuting a charge that the prosecutor knows is not supported by probable cause;

(b) make reasonable efforts to assure that the accused has been advised of the right to, and the procedure for obtaining, counsel and has been given reasonable opportunity to obtain counsel;

(c) not seek to obtain from an unrepresented accused a waiver of

2961 important pretrial rights, such as the right to a preliminary hearing;

(d) make timely disclosure to the defense of all evidence or information known to the prosecutor that tends to negate the guilt of the accused or mitigates the offense, and, in connection with sentencing, disclose to the defense and to the tribunal all unprivileged mitigating information known to the prosecutor, except when the prosecutor is relieved of this responsibility by a protective order of the tribunal;

(e) not subpoena a lawyer in a grand jury or other criminal proceeding to present evidence about a past or present client unless the prosecutor reasonably believes:

(1) the information sought is not protected from disclosure by any applicable privilege;

(2) the evidence sought is essential to the successful completion of an ongoing investigation or prosecution; and

(3) there is no other feasible alternative to obtain the information;

(f) except for statements that are necessary to inform the public of the nature and extent of the prosecutor's action and that serve a legitimate law enforcement purpose, refrain from making extrajudicial comments that have a substantial likelihood of heightening public condemnation of the accused and exercise reasonable care to prevent investigators, law enforcement personnel, employees or other persons assisting or associated with the prosecutor in a criminal case from making an extrajudicial statement that the prosecutor would be prohibited from making under Rule 3.6 or this Rule.

2962
DISCUSSION

Nebraska counties with smaller populations may be served by part-time county attorneys. Neb. Rev. Stat. §23–1206.01. These attorneys are not expected to devote full-time attention to the duties of the office. Whether full time or part time, county attorneys are required to “prosecute or defend, on behalf of the state and county, all suits, applications, or motions, civil or criminal, arising under the laws of the state in which the state or the county is a party or interested.” Neb. Rev. Stat. §23-1201(2). The attorney requesting this opinion is a part-time county attorney. He asks whether any rule of professional conduct prohibits him from simultaneously serving as chairman of the mental health board of a different county.
Mental health boards are created under the Mental Health Commitment Act, Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 71-901 to 71-963. The boards comprise three members, one of whom must be an attorney, all appointed by the presiding judge of the judicial district that the board serves. Neb. Rev. Stat. §71–915(1). The attorney member of the mental health board serves as its chair. Neb. Rev. Stat. §71– 915(2). Board actions are decided by majority vote. Neb. Rev. Stat. §71–915(3).
Proceedings before the mental health board alleging that a person is mentally ill and dangerous are initiated by petition of the county attorney. Neb. Rev. Stat. §71–921. The county attorney also petitions the mental health board in cases alleging that a person is a dangerous sex offender. Neb. Rev. Stat. §71– 1205. These cases are brought “in the interest of” the person who is the subject of the petition. Neb. Rev. Stat. §§71–922(3); 71–1206(3). In either case, the board conducts hearings and rules upon the merits of the petition. Neb. Rev. Stat. §§71–925; 71–1209. At these hearings, the county attorney presents evidence in support of the petition, and the state has the burden to prove the allegations by clear and convincing evidence. Neb. Rev. Stat. §§71–925(1); 71– 1209(1).

This background makes it clear that an attorney serving as county attorney acts as an advocate representing the state when he presents cases before a mental health board. If the same attorney acts as the appointed chair of 2963 a mental health board, he is no longer an advocate representing the State of Nebraska, but instead, he is a fact finder performing an adjudicative function on behalf of a state government entity.
In either situation, therefore, it could be said that the attorney acts on behalf of the state. If he has a client, it resembles an organization, not an individual. Comment [9] to rule 501.13 (regarding a lawyer’s duty to an entity such as a corporation distinct from its officers and directors) makes this observation: “The duty defined in this Rule applies to government organizations. Defining precisely the identity of the client and prescribing the resulting obligations of such lawyers may be more difficult in the government context and is a matter beyond the scope of these Rules.” But no matter the difficulty of identifying exactly who or what the client may be, it is clear that there is no concurrent conflict if the county attorney performs these different functions because in each instance, he acts on behalf of the State of Nebraska. Rule 501.7 is therefore not applicable to the facts presented to this committee.
Nothing in rule 503.8 speaks to the issue raised by this request. And there is no other provision of the Rules that would impede a part-time county attorney from also accepting appointment as a member of a mental health board serving a county in which he does not serve as county attorney.
Just as a judge may not act as prosecutor of a defendant brought before him, so a county attorney could not prosecute a petition to a mental health board of which he is chairperson. This would not, however, prevent him from carrying out the functions of prosecutor and board member in cases in different counties that do not involve the same subject individuals.

CONCLUSION

A lawyer is not prohibited by the Rules of Professional Conduct from simultaneously serving as the part-time county attorney of one Nebraska county and as the chair of the mental health board of another Nebraska county.

2964

What do the rules say today, for your facts?

This opinion is from 2012. Ezel checks the current Nebraska Rules of Professional Conduct against your situation and cites the rules it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace