NCSB January 13, 1989

Can a lawyer join a title company's network and conduct loan closings using documents the lender prepared, and what must the lawyer tell the borrower?

Short answer: The opinion concluded that because the lender has a primary interest in the closing documents, the lender may prepare them and the lawyer does not assist the unauthorized practice of law by conducting the closing; but a lawyer who represents only the lender must clearly notify the borrower in time for the borrower to obtain other counsel.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1989. Ezel answers yours: whether it's allowed on your facts, under the current North Carolina Rules of Professional Conduct, with citations.

Currency note: this opinion is from 1989
Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later opinions or rule amendments may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.
Disclaimer: Advisory only. Not binding precedent.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official ethics opinion. The original opinion (linked on this page) is the authoritative source for any reliance.

Plain-English summary

ABC Co., a title company, contracted with a lending institution to provide title insurance and coordinate residential loan closings, and wanted to enlist Attorney B in a network of approved attorneys who would perform closings under ABC Co.'s instructions. The lender would prepare all closing documents and forward them to Attorney B, who would meet the parties, explain the documents, supervise their execution, and return them to ABC Co. The inquiry asked whether Attorney B could handle closings in this manner.

The opinion answered yes. Under State v. Pledger, 257 N.C. 634, 127 S.E.2d 337 (1962), the lender has a primary interest in the closing documents, so the lender may draft them and Attorney B does not assist the unauthorized practice of law by conducting the closing on these facts. The opinion added that if Attorney B intends to represent only the lender at the closing, he must clearly notify the borrower in time to permit the borrower to obtain other counsel.

Currency note

This opinion was issued in 1989, before the North Carolina State Bar's adoption of the 2003 revisions to the Rules of Professional Conduct. Subsequent rule amendments or later opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current guidance. Verify against current rules before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or requirement mentioned here.

Common questions

Q: Can the lender prepare the closing documents?

A: Yes. The opinion concluded that because the lender has a primary interest in the documents, it may draft them under State v. Pledger.

Q: Does the lawyer aid the unauthorized practice of law by conducting such a closing?

A: No. The opinion concluded the lawyer does not assist the unauthorized practice of law by conducting the closing under these circumstances.

Q: What must a lawyer who represents only the lender tell the borrower?

A: The opinion concluded the lawyer must clearly notify the borrower, in time for the borrower to obtain other counsel, that the lawyer represents only the lender.

Background and rules framework

The opinion did not cite a numbered Rule of Professional Conduct. It applied the unauthorized-practice principle of State v. Pledger, under which a party with a primary interest in a document may prepare it, to conclude the lender's document preparation did not draw the lawyer into assisting unauthorized practice, and it required disclosure to the borrower where the lawyer represented only the lender.

Citations and references

Cases:

  • State v. Pledger, 257 N.C. 634, 127 S.E.2d 337 (1962), a party with a primary interest in a document may prepare it

See also

Source

Original opinion text

Reproduced from the official source for research purposes. The linked source is authoritative.

Inquiry:

ABC Co. is a title company which has contracted with a lending institution to provide title insurance and coordinate residential loan closings. ABC Co. wishes to enlist Attorney B as part of a "network" of approved attorneys who will perform closings subject to ABC Co.'s instructions.

All closing documents will be prepared by the lender and forwarded to Attorney B, who will meet with the parties, explain the documents and supervise their execution. Attorney B will then return the documents to ABC Co.

May Attorney B agree to handle closings in this manner?

Opinion:

Yes. The lender has a primary interest in the closing documents pursuant to State v. Pledger, 257 N.C. 634, 127 S.E.2d 337 (1962). Thus, the lender may draft the closing documents and Attorney B will not be assisting the unauthorized practice of law by conducting the closing under these circumstances.

If Attorney B intends only to represent the lender at the closing, he must clearly notify the borrower in time to permit the borrower to obtain other counsel.

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 1989 opinion on this question. Ezel checks the current North Carolina Rules of Professional Conduct and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the rules it relies on.