NCSB July 15, 1988

Can a plaintiff's lawyer send settlement demands directly to the insurer that is providing defense counsel for the adverse party?

Short answer: The opinion concluded no, unless defense counsel consents, because an insurer that provides counsel to defend its insured against a liability claim is itself a represented party under the no-contact rule and may not be contacted directly by the opposing lawyer.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1988. Ezel answers yours: whether it's allowed on your facts, under the current North Carolina Rules of Professional Conduct, with citations.

Currency note: this opinion is from 1988
Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later opinions or rule amendments may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.
Disclaimer: Advisory only. Not binding precedent.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official ethics opinion. The original opinion (linked on this page) is the authoritative source for any reliance.

Plain-English summary

Lawyer A was insured against professional malpractice. A plaintiff sued Lawyer A for malpractice, and the insurance company provided Lawyer B to defend Lawyer A. The inquiry asked whether the plaintiff's counsel could communicate settlement demands to Lawyer B with a copy to the insurance company.

The opinion answered no, unless Lawyer B consents. Rule 7.4(a) prohibits a lawyer from communicating about the subject of the representation with a party the lawyer knows to be represented by another lawyer in the matter, absent that lawyer's consent or legal authorization. For purposes of the rule, an insurance company that provides counsel for its insured in defending a third party's liability claim is itself a party represented by counsel, and so may not be contacted directly by the third party's lawyer unless the lawyer for the insured and insurer consents.

Currency note

This opinion was issued in 1988, before the North Carolina State Bar's adoption of the 2003 revisions to the Rules of Professional Conduct. The provision it applies (Rule 7.4(a), the no-contact rule) has since been renumbered and revised (the corresponding Model Rule is 4.2). Subsequent rule amendments or later opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current guidance. Verify against current rules before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or requirement mentioned here.

Common questions

Q: Can a plaintiff's lawyer send settlement demands straight to the adverse party's insurer?

A: No, unless defense counsel consents. The opinion concluded the insurer is a represented party under the no-contact rule.

Q: Why is the insurer treated as a represented party?

A: The opinion concluded that an insurer providing counsel to defend its insured against a liability claim is itself a party represented by that counsel.

Q: What would make the direct contact permissible?

A: The opinion concluded the contact is permissible only with the consent of the lawyer for the insured and insurer.

Background and rules framework

The opinion applied North Carolina Rule 7.4(a), the no-contact rule barring communication with a represented party absent counsel's consent or legal authorization (corresponding to Model Rule 4.2). The analysis turned on characterizing the insurer that funds and directs the defense as itself a represented party, not a mere nonparty, so the opposing lawyer's direct contact required consent.

Citations and references

Rules of Professional Conduct:

  • North Carolina Rule 7.4(a) (communication with a represented party)
  • MR 4.2 (communication with person represented by counsel)

See also

Source

Original opinion text

Reproduced from the official source for research purposes. The linked source is authoritative.

Inquiry:

Lawyer A is insured against professional malpractice by Insurance Company. Plaintiff sues Lawyer A for malpractice. Insurance Company provides Lawyer B to defend Lawyer A. May Plaintiff's counsel communicate settlement demands to Lawyer B with a copy to Insurance Company?

Opinion:

No, unless Lawyer B consents. Rule 7.4(a) prohibits a lawyer from communicating regarding the subject of representation with a party the lawyer knows to be represented by another lawyer in the matter, unless the lawyer has the consent of the other lawyer or is authorized by law to do so. For the purpose of this rule, an insurance company which provides counsel for its insured in the defense of a third party's liability claim is itself a party represented by counsel and may, therefore, not be contacted directly by the third party's lawyer unless the lawyer for the insured and insurer consents.

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 1988 opinion on this question. Ezel checks the current North Carolina Rules of Professional Conduct and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the rules it relies on.