Can a North Carolina lawyer personally agree to indemnify the defendant's insurer against unpaid medical liens as a condition of settling the client's case?
Apply this to your situation
This page answers the general question as of 1996. Ezel answers yours: whether it's allowed on your facts, under the current North Carolina Rules of Professional Conduct, with citations.
Plain-English summary
The opinion addressed a personal injury settlement in which the defendant's liability insurer conditioned its offer on the lawyer and client signing an indemnity agreement, in addition to the usual general release. Under that agreement, the lawyer would agree to indemnify the insurer against all claims it might sustain from any outstanding medical lien the client incurred from the accident, with the insurer agreeing to notify the lawyer of medical-provider claims or liens of which it had actual or constructive knowledge. The question was whether the lawyer could ethically sign the indemnity agreement as part of the settlement.
The opinion concluded that the lawyer could not, citing Rule 5.1(b). By personally guaranteeing the insurer against the client's medical liens, the lawyer would assume an obligation that places the lawyer's own financial interest in conflict with the representation of the client.
Currency note
This opinion was issued in 1996, before the North Carolina State Bar's adoption of the 2003 revisions to the Rules of Professional Conduct. Subsequent rule amendments or later opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current guidance. Verify against current rules before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or requirement mentioned here.
Common questions
Q: Can a North Carolina lawyer agree to indemnify the defendant's insurer against the client's medical liens to close a settlement?
A: No. The opinion concluded that a lawyer may not sign such a personal indemnity agreement as a condition of settlement, citing Rule 5.1(b).
Q: Why is the indemnity agreement a problem?
A: The opinion concluded that the arrangement is barred under the conflict rule; personally guaranteeing the insurer against the client's liens puts the lawyer's own interest at odds with the representation.
Background and rules framework
The opinion applied North Carolina's then-current Rule 5.1(b), the conflict-of-interest provision addressing situations where the lawyer's own interests may materially impair the representation, which corresponds to Model Rule 1.7, and reflects the Model Rule 1.8 limits on a lawyer assuming financial obligations connected to the client's matter.
Citations and references
Rules of Professional Conduct:
- MR 1.7 (conflict of interest; lawyer's personal interest)
- MR 1.8 (specific conflict rules; financial entanglements with the client's matter)
- North Carolina Rule 5.1(b)
See also
- NC Ethics Op. 2001-11: disbursements to medical providers
- NC Ethics Op. RPC 248: lawyer-owned mortgage broker conflict
Source
- Landing page: https://www.ncbar.gov/for-lawyers/ethics-and-governing-rules/ethics-opinions/opinions/rpc-228/
Original opinion text
Reproduced from the official source for research purposes. The linked source is authoritative.
Editor's Note: This opinion was originally published as RPC 228 (Revised).
Inquiry:
Attorney A represents Client A who was injured in an automobile collision caused by the negligence of Mr. X. Mr. X has liability insurance with Insurance Carrier. Attorney A negotiated a settlement of Client A's claim with Insurance Carrier for a sum certain. However, Insurance Carrier's settlement offer is conditioned upon the execution by Attorney A and Client A of an indemnity agreement in addition to the traditional general release. In the indemnity agreement, Attorney A would agree to indemnify Insurance Carrier against all claims Insurance Carrier might sustain as a result of any outstanding medical lien incurred by Client A as a result of the accident. The agreement requires Insurance Carrier to notify Attorney A of all medical provider claims or liens of which Insurance Carrier has actual or constructive knowledge. Is it ethical for Attorney A to sign the indemnity agreement as a part of the settlement of Client A's claim?
Opinion:
No. Rule 5.1(b) of the Rules of Professional Conduct.
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read a 1996 opinion on this question. Ezel checks the current North Carolina Rules of Professional Conduct and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the rules it relies on.