NCSB January 17, 1992

Can plaintiff's counsel agree to bear all or part of the costs of litigation, whether in a class action or an ordinary civil suit?

Short answer: The opinion concluded that an attorney may never ethically agree to be ultimately responsible for the costs of litigation. Rule 5.3(b) lets a lawyer advance litigation costs only if the client remains ultimately liable for them, and the rule contains no exception for lawyers prosecuting class actions in federal court, so agreeing to bear those costs is impermissible.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1992. Ezel answers yours: whether it's allowed on your facts, under the current North Carolina Rules of Professional Conduct, with citations.

Currency note: this opinion is from 1992
Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later opinions or rule amendments may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.
Disclaimer: Advisory only. Not binding precedent.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official ethics opinion. The original opinion (linked on this page) is the authoritative source for any reliance.

Plain-English summary

The inquiry asked whether, in a class action under Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, plaintiff's counsel could agree to bear all or part of the litigation costs, and whether in an ordinary civil suit there are any circumstances in which counsel could agree to bear the costs.

The opinion concluded that an attorney may never ethically agree to be ultimately responsible for the costs of litigation. Rule 5.3(b) allows a lawyer to advance the costs of litigation only if the client remains ultimately liable for those expenses. The rule contains no exception for lawyers prosecuting class action litigation in federal court, so it is impermissible for an attorney to agree with the client to bear some or all of the costs of such litigation.

Currency note

This opinion was issued in 1992, before the North Carolina State Bar's adoption of the 2003 revisions to the Rules of Professional Conduct. The opinion now carries an editor's note pointing readers to In re S.E. Hotel Properties Ltd. Partnership, 151 F.R.D. 597 (W.D.N.C. 1993). Subsequent rule amendments or later authority may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current guidance. Verify against current rules before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or requirement mentioned here.

Common questions

Q: Can a lawyer agree to be ultimately responsible for the costs of a case?

A: No. The opinion held that an attorney may never ethically agree to be ultimately responsible for litigation costs.

Q: How may a lawyer handle litigation costs instead?

A: The opinion held that Rule 5.3(b) permits a lawyer to advance the costs of litigation only if the client remains ultimately liable for them.

Q: Is there a special rule for class actions in federal court?

A: No. The opinion held that Rule 5.3(b) contains no exception for class actions in federal court, so counsel cannot agree to bear those costs.

Background and rules framework

The opinion applied North Carolina Rule 5.3(b), permitting a lawyer to advance litigation costs only where the client remains ultimately liable (corresponding to Model Rule 1.8(e)). The analysis turns on the absence of any class-action exception to that requirement. An editor's note directs readers to In re S.E. Hotel Properties for related federal authority.

Citations and references

Rules of Professional Conduct:

  • MR 1.8 (advancing litigation costs; client's ultimate liability)
  • North Carolina Rule 5.3(b) (advancing costs only if the client remains ultimately liable)

Cases:

  • In re S.E. Hotel Properties Ltd. Partnership, 151 F.R.D. 597 (W.D.N.C. 1993) (noted in the opinion's editor's note)

See also

Source

Original opinion text

Reproduced from the official source for research purposes. The linked source is authoritative.

Editors Note: But see In re S.E. Hotel Properties Ltd. Partnership, 151 F.R.D. 597 (W.D.N.C. 1993).

Inquiry:

In a class action under Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, can the plaintiff's counsel agree to bear all or part of the costs of the litigation? In an ordinary civil suit, are there any circumstances under which the plaintiff's counsel can agree to bear the costs of litigation? If so, what are some of those circumstances?

Opinion:

An attorney may never ethically agree to be ultimately responsible for the costs of litigation. Rule 5.3(b) of the Rules of Professional Conduct allows a lawyer to advance the costs of litigation if the client remains ultimately liable for such expenses. The rule contains no exception for lawyers prosecuting class action litigation in federal court. It is therefore impermissible for an attorney to agree with his or her client to bear some or all of the costs of such litigation.

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 1992 opinion on this question. Ezel checks the current North Carolina Rules of Professional Conduct and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the rules it relies on.