If a lawyer is a party in their own divorce, must they disclose client names, case details, and theories in discovery?
Apply this to your situation
This page answers the general question as of 1988. Ezel answers yours: whether it's allowed on your facts, under the current rules of professional conduct in your state, with citations.
Plain-English summary
The committee was asked whether an attorney who is a party in a divorce action must divulge information about client names, the nature of cases, advances, theories of liability, injuries, and evidence as part of discovery. It answered no.
The committee drew a line between public and confidential information. Public-record documents and knowledge must be divulged on request. Divulging the categories listed in the question, however, would possibly violate the confidentiality protection of Rule 1.6, so the attorney-party is not required to produce that information in the divorce discovery.
Currency note
This opinion was issued in 1988, before the State Bar of Montana's adoption of the 2004 revisions to the Rules of Professional Conduct. Subsequent rule amendments or later opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current guidance. Verify against current rules before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or requirement mentioned here.
Common questions
Q: Must a lawyer-party produce client names and case details in their own divorce discovery?
A: No. The opinion concludes that divulging client names, case details, advances, theories, injuries, and evidence would possibly violate Rule 1.6 confidentiality.
Q: Is anything still discoverable?
A: Yes. The opinion states that public-record documents and knowledge must be divulged upon request.
Background and rules framework
The opinion interprets Montana Rule of Professional Conduct 1.6 (Confidentiality of Information; Model Rule 1.6) in the context of civil discovery directed at a lawyer who is a party.
Citations and references
Rules of Professional Conduct:
- Mont. R. Prof. Cond. 1.6 (confidentiality of information) / Model Rule 1.6
See also
- State Bar of Montana Ethics Op. 960828: Confidentiality of Client Billing Information
- State Bar of Montana Ethics Op. 870326: A Lawyer's Duty When the Client Commits Perjury
Source
- Landing page: https://www.montanabar.org/For-Attorneys/State-Bar-Resources/Ethics-Opinions
- Original PDF: https://www.montanabar.org/Portals/MONTANA/Site Resources/Ethics Opinions/1.6 confidentiality/880203.pdf
Original opinion text
Reproduced from the official source for research purposes. The linked source is authoritative.
Ethics Opinion
QUESTION PRESENTED: Must an attorney who is a party in a divorce action divulge information regarding client names, nature of cases, advances, theories of liability, injuries and evidence, etc. as part of discovery?
ANSWER: No.
ANALYSIS: Public record documents and knowledge must be divulged upon request, but divulging the above would possibly violate the confidentiality Rule 1.6.
THIS OPINION IS ADVISORY ONLY
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read a 1988 opinion on this question. Ezel checks the current rules of professional conduct in your state and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the rules it relies on.