MSBAR April 6, 2013

Can an inactive member of the Mississippi Bar state on firm letterhead or in advertising that he is licensed and admitted to practice law in Mississippi?

Short answer: The opinion concluded that an inactive member may not represent on letterhead or in advertising that he is licensed and admitted to practice in Mississippi, because by statute an inactive member is not engaged in the practice of law, making the statement materially misleading under Rule 7.1.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 2013. Ezel answers yours: whether it's allowed on your facts, under the current Mississippi Rules of Professional Conduct, with citations.

Currency note: this opinion is from 2013
Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later opinions or rule amendments may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.
Disclaimer: Advisory only. Not binding precedent.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official ethics opinion. The original opinion (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ethics opinion (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The Committee addressed Attorney A, who practiced patent and trademark law in another state and had voluntarily taken inactive status with the Mississippi Bar. Attorney A asked whether he could hold himself out, on firm letterhead, in a directory such as Martindale-Hubbell, and in advertising such as the Yellow Pages, as "licensed and admitted to practice in Mississippi State Courts" and in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi, and whether his limitation to patent and trademark practice affected the answer.

The opinion applied Rule 7.1, which bars a false, deceptive, or misleading communication, including one that contains a material misrepresentation or omits a fact necessary to keep the statement from being materially misleading, or that creates an unjustified expectation about results. It then looked to Miss. Code Ann. 73-3-120 (Supp. 1987), which defines an inactive member as a member in good standing who is not engaged in the practice of law in the state, and defines "practice of law" to include holding oneself out as a practicing attorney.

The opinion reasoned that although the attorney was technically admitted to the Bar, he had voluntarily requested inactive status and was therefore, by statute, not engaged in the practice of law. Because a layman could reasonably believe that being "licensed and admitted to practice in Mississippi" meant the attorney could presently counsel on Mississippi-law matters, when in fact he was prohibited from doing so, the communication would be a material misrepresentation and likely to create an unjustified expectation, both prohibited by Rule 7.1. The opinion held the proposed conduct unethical. Having so concluded, it found no need to reach the second question, noting in passing that the rules permit an attorney to hold out as a "patent attorney," which did not change the result.

In practice

Under this opinion, an inactive member of the Mississippi Bar may not state on letterhead, in directories, or in other advertising that he is licensed and admitted to practice law in Mississippi. Per the opinion, the analysis turns on the statutory definition of inactive status: an inactive member is not engaged in the practice of law in the state, so representing oneself as presently able to practice in Mississippi is a material misrepresentation under Rule 7.1. The opinion noted that the separate permission to hold out as a "patent attorney" does not cure the misleading representation about Mississippi licensure.

Common questions

Q: Can an inactive Mississippi Bar member advertise that he is licensed to practice in Mississippi?

A: No. The opinion concluded that doing so is materially misleading under Rule 7.1, because an inactive member is by statute not engaged in the practice of law in the state.

Q: Why is "licensed and admitted to practice in Mississippi" misleading for an inactive member?

A: The opinion reasoned that a layman could reasonably read it to mean the attorney can presently counsel on Mississippi-law matters, when in fact inactive status prohibits him from practicing, so the statement is a material misrepresentation and creates an unjustified expectation.

Q: Does limiting the practice to patent and trademark law change the answer?

A: No. The opinion found no need to decide the second question but noted that the rules' permission to hold out as a "patent attorney" has no effect on the conclusion that advertising Mississippi licensure while inactive is misleading.

Background and rules framework

The opinion interprets Mississippi Rule 7.1 (false, deceptive, or misleading communications about a lawyer's services), corresponding to Model Rule 7.1, and read it against Miss. Code Ann. 73-3-120, which defines active and inactive Bar membership and the practice of law. It also referred to the rule permitting a "patent attorney" designation (cited in the opinion as Rule 7.6(b)(1)), corresponding to the field-of-practice rule (Model Rule 7.4).

Citations and references

Rules of Professional Conduct (Mississippi; cf. Model Rules):

  • MRPC 7.1 (false, deceptive, or misleading communications) (cf. Model Rule 7.1).
  • MRPC 7.6(b)(1) (as cited in the opinion) ("patent attorney" designation) (cf. Model Rule 7.4).

Statutes:

  • Miss. Code Ann. 73-3-120 (Supp. 1987) (defining active and inactive Bar membership and the practice of law).

See also

Source

Original opinion text

Reproduced from the official source for research purposes. The linked source is authoritative.

ETHICS OPINION NO. 150

OF THE MISSISSIPPI BAR

RENDERED June 02, 1988

AMENDED April 06, 2013

FIRM NAME - LETTERHEAD - An attorney should not represent on firm letterhead or by other means of advertisement that he is licensed to practice law in Mississippi when in fact said attorney is an inactive member of The Mississippi Bar and as such is prohibited by statute from practicing law in Mississippi until he complies with the requirements for active status.

The Ethics Committee of The Mississippi Bar has been asked to render an opinion on the following facts:

Attorney A practices patent and trademark law in a state other than the State of Mississippi. Attorney A has previously been an active member of the Mississippi Bar but is presently on inactive status by his own request. Attorney A would like to know whether or not he can hold himself out as being licensed and admitted to practice in Mississippi State Courts and in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi on the firm letterhead, in a legal directory such as the Martindale-Hubbel and in other advertising such as in the Yellow Pages in Mississippi. Attorney A also asks whether or not the fact that his firm's practice is limited to patent and trademark law has any effect on his ability to perform the above advertising.

We are asked today to examine the ethical responsibilities of an attorney who is an inactive member of the Mississippi Bar relative to communication to the public of that attorney's legal services and qualifications. In examining this issue, we must first turn to the bench mark rule found in the Mississippi Rules of Professional Conduct concerning information about legal services. Rule 7.1 titled "Communications concerning a lawyer's service" states in applicable part:

A lawyer shall not make a false, deceptive or misleading communication about the lawyer or the lawyer's services. A communication is false, deceptive or misleading if it: (a) contains a material misrepresentation of fact or law, or omits a fact necessary to make the statement considered as a whole not materially misleading; (b) is likely to create an unjustified expectation about results the lawyer can achieve, or states or implies that the lawyer can achieve results by means that violate the rules of professional conduct or other law; .

Thus, the ethical question we are faced with is whether or not being an inactive member of the Mississippi Bar while at the same time holding one's self out as "licensed and admitted to practice in Mississippi" falls into conduct proscribed in sub parts (a) and (b) of Rule 7.1. To answer that question, we must look at the statutory guidelines regarding inactive membership of the Mississippi Bar. Miss. Code Ann. 73-3-120 (Supp. 1987) defines the different categories of membership of the Mississippi State Bar as follows:

Members of the (Mississippi State Bar) shall be divided into active and inactive membership classes which shall be defined as follows:

a. "active member" means any person admitted to practice law in this state and who is engaged in the practice of law in this state. Except as otherwise provided in 73-3-125, all active members shall be entitled to vote and hold office in the association.

b. "inactive member" means any member, in good standing, who is not engaged in the practice of law in this state. A person may, upon written request, be enrolled as an inactive member. Inactive member shall not be entitled to vote and hold office in the association.

As used in this section, the "practice of law" shall include any person holding himself out as a practicing attorney or occupying any position which he may be called upon to give legal advice or counsel or to examine the law or to pass upon the legal effect of any act, document or law.

The language sought to be used by the requesting attorney is that the attorney is "licensed and admitted to practice in the State of Mississippi." While it appears technically correct that the attorney was admitted to the Mississippi Bar, that attorney voluntarily requested inactive status of the Bar. By statute, the attorney is therefore ". . . not engaged in the practice of law in this state." The same statute further tells us that ". . . the practice of law shall include any person holding himself as a practicing attorney . . ." Since a layman could reasonably believe that being "licensed and admitted to practice in Mississippi" means that the attorney is presently able to counsel on matters involving Mississippi law, when in fact said attorney is prohibited from such action, then the communication would be a material misrepresentation of fact and/or likely to create an unjustified expectation about results the lawyer can achieve, also prohibited by Rule 7.1. We therefore hold in today's opinion that the conduct set forth in the Statement of Facts is in violation of the Mississippi Rules of Professional Conduct and therefore unethical.

Since we have today determined that the requesting attorney's conduct in advertising that he is licensed and admitted to practice in the State of Mississippi when in fact he is an inactive member of the Bar is materially misleading, we have no need to render an opinion on the second portion of the request. We note in passing, however, that the Mississippi Rules of Professional Conduct 7.6(b)(1) do sanction an attorney's communication to the public that he or she is a "patent attorney" or words to that effect. The fact that a Mississippi attorney may represent to the public that he or she is a "patent attorney" has no effect on our ruling that the requesting attorney's proposed conduct is materially misleading and therefore prohibited.

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 2013 opinion on this question. Ezel checks the current Mississippi Rules of Professional Conduct and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the rules it relies on.