Could a lawyer remove personal impressions and case notes before returning a former client’s file?

Short answer On the described facts, the opinion treated the notes as part of the file that had to be provided to the client.
Bar
MOLEC
Issued
1998

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1998. Ask about yours and see what the current Missouri Rules of Professional Conduct say for your facts, with citations.

How much weight this carries: Under Missouri Supreme Court Rule 5.30, formal opinions are binding; informal opinions are advisory. Source.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official ethics opinion. The original opinion (linked on this page) is the authoritative source for any reliance.

Plain-English summary

A lawyer wanted to remove impressions and notes from a former client’s file before handing it over. The notes recorded calls and meetings; research notes were kept separately.

The opinion said the described notes were part of the file that had to be provided to the client and referred to amended Formal Opinion 115. Official notes identify later changes to Rules 4-1.15 and 4-1.22.

Currency note

This opinion was issued in 1998, before Missouri’s 2007 revisions to the Rules of Professional Conduct. Later amendments or opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context and verify current rules before relying on it. The official Rule 4-1.9 and 4-1.10 reference notes identify July 1, 2007 amendments.

Common questions

Q: Could the lawyer withhold the described notes?

A: No. The opinion said they belonged in the client file.

Q: Did it address the separate research file?

A: The question mentioned it, but the answer expressly addressed the described notes.

Background and rules framework

The official reference notes identify former Rules 4-1.15 and 4-1.22; the answer cites Formal Opinion 115.

Citations and references

Missouri Rules of Professional Conduct:

  • Rule 4-1.15
  • Rule 4-1.22

See also

Source

Original opinion text

Reproduced from the official source for research purposes. The linked source is authoritative.

Reference Note: Rule 4–1.15 was amended, effective July 1, 2013. This opinion is based on the rule in effect prior to that date. Please see the July 1, 2013 version of Rule 4–1.15 and 4–1.22.

Reference Note: Effective July 1, 2016, subdivision 4–1.22 of Rule 4 was repealed and a new subdivision 4–1.22 adopted in lieu thereof. This opinion is based on Rule 4 in effect prior to that date.

QUESTION: May Attorney remove notes from the file before it is turned over to a former client? The information consists of Attorney´s impressions about the case, as well as Attorney´s comments and thoughts made during telephone calls about the case and during meetings with Attorney´s staff and clients. A separate research file was maintained for Attorney´s research notes regarding the case.

ANSWER: Based upon the information Attorney has provided and the nature of the material in question in this case, the notes are part of the file which must be provided to the client. Please see Formal Opinion 115, as amended.

What do the rules say today, for your facts?

This opinion is from 1998. Ezel checks the current Missouri Rules of Professional Conduct against your situation and cites the rules it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace