May a lawyer represent a new client whose case attacks a former client serving as an adverse witness?

Short answer The opinion permits the representation under Rule 4-1.9(b) unless the lawyer acquired information from the former client that could be used against that client. It calls for limited disclosure of the earlier representation to the new client.
Bar
MOLEC
Issued
1996

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1996. Ask about yours and see what the current Missouri Rules of Professional Conduct say for your facts, with citations.

How much weight this carries: Under Missouri Supreme Court Rule 5.30, formal opinions are binding; informal opinions are advisory. Source.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official ethics opinion. The original opinion (linked on this page) is the authoritative source for any reliance.

Plain-English summary

Client B sought representation in a case alleging wrongdoing by former client A, who would be an adverse witness but not a named defendant.

The opinion permits representation unless the lawyer acquired information during the prior representation that could harm A in B’s case. It says B should be told about the earlier representation, without revealing information beyond that fact or matters generally known.

Currency note

This opinion was issued in 1996, before Missouri’s 2007 revisions to the Rules of Professional Conduct. Subsequent rule amendments or later opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context and verify current rules before relying on it.

Common questions

Q: Does A’s status as an adverse witness automatically bar the case?

A: No. The answer makes the result depend on whether the lawyer acquired information usable against A.

Q: What may be disclosed to B about the old matter?

A: The fact of the former representation and information that has become generally known, but no more.

Background and rules framework

The answer applies Rule 4-1.9(b) to confidential information from the earlier representation.

Citations and references

Missouri Rules of Professional Conduct:

  • Rule 4-1.9(b)

See also

Source

Original opinion text

Reproduced from the official source for research purposes. The linked source is authoritative.

QUESTION: Attorney has been approached by Client B for representation. In the case, Client B will make allegations against Client A who is a former client of Attorney. Client A will not actually be a named defendant but will be an adverse witness. ANSWER: Under Rule 4–1.9(b), Attorney may represent Client B unless Attorney obtained information in the course of representing Client A that could be used to the detriment of Client A in the course of representing Client B. Attorney should disclose Attorney´s previous representation of Client A to Client B, without disclosing any information beyond the fact of the representation and information which has become generally known.

What do the rules say today, for your facts?

This opinion is from 1996. Ezel checks the current Missouri Rules of Professional Conduct against your situation and cites the rules it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace