May Missouri counsel use another state’s contact rule to interview a former corporate employee in Missouri for litigation there?

Short answer The opinion permits following the other state’s Rule 4-4.2 interpretations if the entire proceeding is litigated under that state’s courts and the interpretation comes from a court or disciplinary authority.
Bar
MOLEC
Issued
1996

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1996. Ask about yours and see what the current Missouri Rules of Professional Conduct say for your facts, with citations.

How much weight this carries: Under Missouri Supreme Court Rule 5.30, formal opinions are binding; informal opinions are advisory. Source.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official ethics opinion. The original opinion (linked on this page) is the authoritative source for any reliance.

Plain-English summary

A Missouri lawyer admitted as a visiting attorney in another state wanted to interview a former corporate employee living in Missouri for a lawsuit filed in that other state.

The opinion allows reliance on the other state’s Rule 4-4.2 rules and rulings if all of the proceeding will be litigated under that state’s courts. It requires any ruling followed to be an official court or disciplinary-authority interpretation.

Currency note

This opinion was issued in 1996, before Missouri’s 2007 revisions to the Rules of Professional Conduct. Subsequent rule amendments or later opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context and verify current rules before relying on it.

Common questions

Q: What litigation-location condition did the opinion impose?

A: All of the proceeding must be litigated under the other state’s courts.

Q: May the lawyer rely on an informal view of the other state’s rule?

A: No. The answer requires an official interpretation by a court or disciplinary authority.

Background and rules framework

The answer addresses Rule 4-4.2 across jurisdictions for a former-employee interview.

Citations and references

Missouri Rules of Professional Conduct:

  • Rule 4-4.2

See also

Source

Original opinion text

Reproduced from the official source for research purposes. The linked source is authoritative.

QUESTION: Attorney is licensed in Missouri and represents a party adverse to a corporate defendant. The lawsuit is filed in another state in which Attorney has been admitted as a visiting attorney. Attorney wants to conduct an ex parte interview of a former employee of the corporate defendant who resides in Missouri. The rules of the other state would permit such an interview. May Attorney conduct the interview? ANSWER: As long as all of the proceeding will be litigated under the jurisdiction of the courts of the other state, Attorney may follow the rules and rulings of the other state regarding Rule 4–4.2. However, the rulings which Attorney follows must be official interpretations of a court or disciplinary authority.

What do the rules say today, for your facts?

This opinion is from 1996. Ezel checks the current Missouri Rules of Professional Conduct against your situation and cites the rules it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace