Could an employee's lawyer call the employer-requested examination physician about a promised report?

Short answer The opinion said the limited status inquiry, without substantive discussion and under the stated circumstances, did not violate the Rules of Professional Conduct.
Bar
MOLEC
Issued
1994

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1994. Ask about yours and see what the current Missouri Rules of Professional Conduct say for your facts, with citations.

How much weight this carries: Under Missouri Supreme Court Rule 5.30, formal opinions are binding; informal opinions are advisory. Source.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official ethics opinion. The original opinion (linked on this page) is the authoritative source for any reliance.

Plain-English summary

In a workers' compensation case, the employer's lawyer requested a medical examination. The physician told the employee he would send a copy of the report to the employee's lawyer, but weeks passed without delivery.

The employee's lawyer called the physician only to ask about the report's status and did not discuss substantive matters. The opinion said that limited contact, on those specific facts, did not violate the Rules of Professional Conduct.

Currency note

This 1994 opinion predates Missouri's 2007 amendments to its Rules of Professional Conduct. An official reference note identifies July 1, 2007 amendments to Rules 4-1.9 and 4-1.10. Subsequent rule amendments or later opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context and verify current rules before relying on it.

Common questions

Q: Was the described status call improper ex parte contact?

A: No. The opinion found no rules violation under the stated circumstances.

Q: What limited the call?

A: The lawyer asked only about the promised report's status and did not discuss substantive matters.

Background and rules framework

The opinion addressed a narrow communication with a physician retained for an employer-requested examination. It cited no numbered rule.

See also

Source

Original opinion text

Reproduced from the official source for research purposes. The linked source is authoritative.

QUESTION: In a worker´s compensation case, employer´s attorney requests a medical examination of the employee. During the examination, the physician tells the employee he will send a copy of his report to the employee´s attorney. After several weeks and the report has not been received, the employee´s attorney telephones the physician and inquires about the status without discussing substantive matters. Is this an improper ex parte contact? ANSWER: The limited contact described, under the specific circumstances described, would not violate the Rules of Professional Conduct.

What do the rules say today, for your facts?

This opinion is from 1994. Ezel checks the current Missouri Rules of Professional Conduct against your situation and cites the rules it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace