Could counsel for a corporate opponent contact a former employee's own lawyer about speaking with the employee?

Short answer The opinion said yes to contacting the former employee's own lawyer for permission on the stated facts.
Bar
MOLEC
Issued
1994

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1994. Ask about yours and see what the current Missouri Rules of Professional Conduct say for your facts, with citations.

How much weight this carries: Under Missouri Supreme Court Rule 5.30, formal opinions are binding; informal opinions are advisory. Source.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official ethics opinion. The original opinion (linked on this page) is the authoritative source for any reliance.

Plain-English summary

A lawyer litigating against a corporation had been approached by its former employee, who claimed helpful information but faced legal issues in providing it. The question stated that ex parte contact with the former employee would be prohibited by Rule 4-4.2 and that the employee had retained a lawyer on those issues.

The opinion said the litigating lawyer could contact the former employee's own attorney, instead of the corporation's attorney, to seek permission to speak with the former employee.

Currency note

This 1994 opinion predates Missouri's 2007 amendments to its Rules of Professional Conduct. An official reference note identifies July 1, 2007 amendments to Rules 4-1.9 and 4-1.10. Subsequent rule amendments or later opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context and verify current rules before relying on it.

Common questions

Q: Whose lawyer could be contacted?

A: The former employee's own lawyer, according to the opinion.

Q: What contact did the question assume was prohibited?

A: Ex parte contact with the former employee under Rule 4-4.2.

Q: Did the opinion decide the employee could provide the information?

A: No. It answered the narrower question of whom to contact about permission to speak.

Background and rules framework

The opinion addressed a Rule 4-4.2 contact question involving a former corporate employee represented separately about information in the suit.

Citations and references

Rules of Professional Conduct:

  • Missouri Rule 4-4.2

See also

Source

Original opinion text

Reproduced from the official source for research purposes. The linked source is authoritative.

QUESTION: Attorney represents a client against a corporation. Attorney has been contacted by a former employee of the corporation with whom ex parte contact would be prohibited by Rule 4–4.2. The former employee has informed Attorney that he has information which would be helpful in the suit but that there are legal issues regarding his ability to provide the information. The former employee has retained his own attorney regarding these issues. May Attorney contact this attorney rather than the corporation´s attorney for permission to speak with the former employee. ANSWER: Yes.

What do the rules say today, for your facts?

This opinion is from 1994. Ezel checks the current Missouri Rules of Professional Conduct against your situation and cites the rules it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace