Could a lawyer and planner refer clients to each other without fees, and distribute cards and pens through Welcome Wagon?

Short answer The opinion barred an exclusive reciprocal referral agreement under Rules 4-7.2(c) and 4-7.3(b), allowed nonobligatory willingness to accept referrals, and allowed general distribution of cards and pens.
Bar
MOLEC
Issued
1994

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1994. Ask about yours and see what the current Missouri Rules of Professional Conduct say for your facts, with citations.

How much weight this carries: Under Missouri Supreme Court Rule 5.30, formal opinions are binding; informal opinions are advisory. Source.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official ethics opinion. The original opinion (linked on this page) is the authoritative source for any reliance.

Plain-English summary

A lawyer asked about mutual recommendations with a financial planner without any fee exchange, and about distributing business cards and imprinted pens in Welcome Wagon baskets.

The opinion rejected exclusive reciprocal recommendations as giving value for referrals and as personal solicitation under Rules 4-7.2(c) and 4-7.3(b). It found no violation if each person merely expressed willingness to accept referrals without obligation. It also approved general distribution of cards and pens through the baskets.

Currency note

This 1994 opinion predates Missouri's 2007 amendments to its Rules of Professional Conduct. An official reference note identifies July 1, 2007 amendments to Rules 4-1.9 and 4-1.10. Subsequent rule amendments or later opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context and verify current rules before relying on it.

Common questions

Q: Did the absence of a referral fee make exclusivity acceptable?

A: No. The opinion treated exclusive reciprocal recommendations as something of value exchanged for referrals.

Q: What referral arrangement did it allow?

A: Each person could express a willingness to accept referrals with no obligation on either side.

Q: Could the lawyer use Welcome Wagon baskets?

A: Yes, for general distribution of cards and imprinted pens.

Background and rules framework

The opinion applied Rules 4-7.2(c) and 4-7.3(b) to reciprocal lawyer-planner referrals and separately addressed general promotional materials.

Citations and references

Rules of Professional Conduct:

  • Missouri Rule 4-7.2(c)
  • Missouri Rule 4-7.3(b)

See also

Source

Original opinion text

Reproduced from the official source for research purposes. The linked source is authoritative.

QUESTION: Question 1. May Attorney and a financial planner have an agreement that they will recommend each other if no exchange of fees is involved? Question 2. May Attorney generally distribute cards and imprinted pens through Welcome Wagon baskets? ANSWER: Question 1. Not if Attorney and financial planner agree to recommend each other exclusively. This kind of exclusive arrangement would involve giving something of value in exchange for referrals in violation of Rule 4–7.2(c). It would also involve personal solicitation in violation of Rule 4–7.3(b). However, if each merely expresses a willingness to accept referrals without any obligation on the part of either person, no violation would occur. Question 2. Yes.

What do the rules say today, for your facts?

This opinion is from 1994. Ezel checks the current Missouri Rules of Professional Conduct against your situation and cites the rules it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace