Could a prosecutor privately represent an accident plaintiff against a defendant the prosecutor convicted of DWI in that accident?

Short answer The opinion found a Rule 1.7(b) conflict and said consent was unavailable because the state was one of the prosecutor's clients.
Bar
MOLEC
Issued
1994

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1994. Ask about yours and see what the current Missouri Rules of Professional Conduct say for your facts, with citations.

How much weight this carries: Under Missouri Supreme Court Rule 5.30, formal opinions are binding; informal opinions are advisory. Source.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official ethics opinion. The original opinion (linked on this page) is the authoritative source for any reliance.

Plain-English summary

A prosecutor successfully prosecuted a defendant for DWI arising from an automobile accident. The prosecutor's private practice was asked to represent a plaintiff against that defendant in a civil case from the same accident.

The opinion found a conflict under Rule 1.7(b). It said consent was not an option because the state was one of the lawyer's clients.

Currency note

This 1994 opinion predates Missouri's 2007 amendments to its Rules of Professional Conduct. An official reference note identifies July 1, 2007 amendments to Rules 4-1.9 and 4-1.10. Subsequent rule amendments or later opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context and verify current rules before relying on it.

Common questions

Q: Did the shared accident matter?

A: Yes. Both the prosecution and proposed civil action arose from the same accident.

Q: Could the state consent to the conflict?

A: The opinion said consent was not an option because the state was a client.

Background and rules framework

The opinion applied Rule 1.7(b), as cited in the source, to a prosecutor's proposed private civil representation from the same event.

Citations and references

Rules of Professional Conduct:

  • Missouri Rule 1.7(b)

See also

Source

Original opinion text

Reproduced from the official source for research purposes. The linked source is authoritative.

QUESTION: Attorney is a prosecuting attorney. As prosecutor, Attorney successfully prosecuted Defendant for DWI related to an auto accident. Attorney also has a private practice and has been asked to represent Plaintiff in a civil action against Defendant related to the same auto accident. ANSWER: This would be a conflict of interest under Rule 1.7(b). Because the state is one of Attorney´s client´s, consent to the conflict is not an option.

What do the rules say today, for your facts?

This opinion is from 1994. Ezel checks the current Missouri Rules of Professional Conduct against your situation and cites the rules it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace