May a Missouri law firm keep a retired, unaffiliated lawyer's name in the firm name?

Short answer Generally no. Rule 4-7.5 permits continued use only if the retired lawyer's name has become so well known that it is considered a trade name, and Rule 4-7.1 still prohibits a false or misleading firm name.
Bar
MOLEC
Issued
January 23, 2024

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 2024. Ask about yours and see what the current Missouri Rules of Professional Conduct say for your facts, with citations.

How much weight this carries: Under Missouri Supreme Court Rule 5.30, formal opinions are binding; informal opinions are advisory. Source.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official ethics opinion. The original opinion (linked on this page) is the authoritative source for any reliance.

Plain-English summary

The lawyer had retired from a firm whose name included the lawyer's name and no longer participated in or maintained any affiliation with the firm.

Rule 4-7.5 generally prevents the firm from continuing to identify itself with that retired lawyer's name. Comment [1] supplies a narrow exception when the name has become sufficiently well known to be considered a trade name.

Any continued name must also satisfy Rule 4-7.1's prohibition on false or misleading communications and comply with substantive law.

In practice

Under this opinion, retirement and the end of affiliation ordinarily require removal of the lawyer's name. The trade-name exception depends on how well known the name has become and does not displace the separate false-or-misleading standard.

Common questions

Q: May the firm keep the name merely because the lawyer retired?

A: No. The opinion's general rule is removal when the retired lawyer no longer participates or is affiliated.

Q: What exception does Rule 4-7.5 recognize?

A: Continued use when the retired lawyer's name is so well known that it is considered a trade name.

Q: Does the trade-name exception end the analysis?

A: No. Rule 4-7.1 still requires the firm name not to be false or misleading.

Q: Does other law still apply?

A: Yes. The opinion states that the name must comply with substantive law.

Background and rules framework

Missouri Rule 4-7.5 and Comment [1] govern use of a retired lawyer's name and the trade-name exception. Rule 4-7.1 provides the separate prohibition on false or misleading firm names.

Citations and references

Rules of Professional Conduct:

  • Missouri Rule 4-7.5 and Comment [1] (firm names and retired lawyers)
  • Missouri Rule 4-7.1 (false or misleading communications)

Other opinions cited:

  • Missouri Informal Opinions 980185, 950138, 20000057, 20000231, 20010065, and 960108

See also

Source

Original opinion text

Reproduced from the official source for research purposes. The linked source is authoritative.

Question: Lawyer is retired from a law firm in which Lawyer’s name is included in the name of the law firm. Lawyer is no longer participating in, or affiliated with, the law firm. May law firm continue to use Lawyer’s name in the name of the law firm?

Answer: Pursuant to Rule 4–7.5, the name of a retired lawyer who is no longer participating in, or affiliated with, the law firm may not be used to identify that law firm unless the name has become so well known that it is considered to be a trade name. See Rule 4–7.5, Comment [1], Missouri Informal Opinions 980185, 950138, 20000057, 20000231, 20010065, and 960108. A law firm name may not be false and misleading per Rule 4–7.1 and must comply with substantive law.

What do the rules say today, for your facts?

This opinion is from 2024. Ezel checks the current Missouri Rules of Professional Conduct against your situation and cites the rules it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace