May a lawyer who mediated a dissolution prepare modification documents for both parties?

Short answer No. After mediation, the lawyer may participate in the proceeding only with all parties’ informed written consent, and even then may represent only one party. The opinion also bars joint representation under Rule 4-1.7(b)(3).
Bar
MOLEC
Issued
2010

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 2010. Ask about yours and see what the current Missouri Rules of Professional Conduct say for your facts, with citations.

Currency note: this opinion is from 2010
Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later opinions or rule amendments may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.
How much weight this carries: Under Missouri Supreme Court Rule 5.30, formal opinions are binding; informal opinions are advisory. Source.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official ethics opinion. The original opinion (linked on this page) is the authoritative source for any reliance.

Plain-English summary

A lawyer who mediated dissolution matters asked whether the lawyer could prepare documents for both parties to modify a dissolution.

Under Rule 4-1.12, the opinion bars participation in the same proceeding after serving as mediator unless all parties give informed consent confirmed in writing. With that consent, the lawyer could represent only one party. The lawyer must clearly tell the other party that the lawyer does not represent that party and their communications are not confidential. Rule 4-1.7(b)(3) also bars joint representation of the two parties.

In practice

The opinion rejects preparing the modification documents as joint counsel. It conditions any later role after mediation on every party’s informed written consent and limits that role to one party.

Common questions

Q: Can the mediator later represent both parties?

A: No. The opinion applies Rule 4-1.7(b)(3) to bar joint representation.

Q: Can the mediator represent one party?

A: Only if all parties give informed consent confirmed in writing under Rule 4-1.12.

Q: What must the other party be told?

A: The opinion requires clear communication that the lawyer does not represent the other party and that communications with the lawyer are not confidential.

Background and rules framework

The opinion applies Rule 4-1.12 to a lawyer’s participation after mediation and Rule 4-1.7(b)(3) to the proposed joint representation.

Citations and references

Missouri Rules of Professional Conduct:

  • Rule 4-1.12
  • Rule 4-1.7

See also

Source

Original opinion text

Reproduced from the official source for research purposes. The linked source is authoritative.

QUESTION: Attorney is a mediator in dissolution matters. May Attorney prepare the necessary documents for the parties to modify a dissolution?

ANSWER: Under Rule 4–1.12, Attorney may not participate in any proceeding in which Attorney participated as a mediator, “unless all parties to the proceeding give informed consent, confirmed in writing.” If informed consent were obtained from both parties, Attorney will only be able to represent one party and solely that party. It would also be very important for Attorney to clearly communicate to the other party that Attorney will not be representing that party’s interests, at all, and that no communications between Attorney and the unrepresented party would be confidential. Under Rule 4–1.7(b)(3), it is not permissible for Attorney to represent them jointly.

What do the rules say today, for your facts?

This opinion is from 2010. Ezel checks the current Missouri Rules of Professional Conduct against your situation and cites the rules it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace