Could a professional corporation put a salaried nonshareholder lawyer’s name in its firm name?

Short answer No. The opinion said that would imply the lawyer was a shareholder and violate Rules 4-7.1 and 4-7.5(f).
Bar
MOLEC
Issued
2000

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 2000. Ask about yours and see what the current Missouri Rules of Professional Conduct say for your facts, with citations.

How much weight this carries: Under Missouri Supreme Court Rule 5.30, formal opinions are binding; informal opinions are advisory. Source.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official ethics opinion. The original opinion (linked on this page) is the authoritative source for any reliance.

Plain-English summary

A professional corporation wanted to put a salaried lawyer's name in its firm name even though that lawyer held no shares and did not participate directly in profits.

The opinion said the name would imply shareholder status and violate Rules 4-7.1 and 4-7.5(f).

Currency note

This opinion was issued in 2000, before Missouri’s 2007 revisions to the Rules of Professional Conduct. Later amendments or opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context and verify current rules before relying on it. The official Rule 4-1.9 and 4-1.10 reference notes identify July 1, 2007 amendments.

Common questions

Q: Why was the name rejected?

A: It would imply that the nonshareholder lawyer was a shareholder.

Q: Which rules did the opinion cite?

A: Rules 4-7.1 and 4-7.5(f).

Background and rules framework

The opinion applied firm-name and misleading-communication rules to the lawyer's actual ownership status.

Citations and references

Missouri Rules of Professional Conduct:

  • Rule 4-7.1
  • Rule 4-7.5

See also

Source

Original opinion text

Reproduced from the official source for research purposes. The linked source is authoritative.

QUESTION: Attorney’s firm is currently a professional corporation. One of the lawyers practicing in the firm, A, is not a shareholder. All of A’s compensation is paid as W2 wages. A does receive a bonus based upon the amount of work that A brings in. A does not share any of the expenses. A does not directly participate in the profits, except for salary and a simple pension plan. May A, who is not a shareholder of a professional corporation, have A’s name included in the professional corporation’s name?

ANSWER: It would violate Rules 4–7.1 and 4–7.5(f) to include A in the firm name. Including A in the firm name would imply that A is a shareholder in the professional corporation.

What do the rules say today, for your facts?

This opinion is from 2000. Ezel checks the current Missouri Rules of Professional Conduct against your situation and cites the rules it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace