What did the opinion say a lawyer should do about suspected improper solicitation letters to debtors?

Short answer If the lawyer believed another lawyer violated Rule 4-7.3, the opinion said to report that lawyer to the office for its independent determination.
Bar
MOLEC
Issued
2000

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 2000. Ask about yours and see what the current Missouri Rules of Professional Conduct say for your facts, with citations.

How much weight this carries: Under Missouri Supreme Court Rule 5.30, formal opinions are binding; informal opinions are advisory. Source.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official ethics opinion. The original opinion (linked on this page) is the authoritative source for any reliance.

Plain-English summary

A creditor-side lawyer saw letters soliciting debtors for bankruptcy representation and asked whether suspected Rule 4-7.3 violations should be reported.

The opinion said a lawyer who believed Rule 4-7.3 had been violated should report the other lawyer to the office, which would independently decide whether a violation occurred.

Currency note

This opinion was issued in 2000, before Missouri’s 2007 revisions to the Rules of Professional Conduct. Later amendments or opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context and verify current rules before relying on it. The official Rule 4-1.9 and 4-1.10 reference notes identify July 1, 2007 amendments.

Common questions

Q: Did the office decide the letters violated the rule?

A: No. It said the office would make an independent determination after a report.

Q: What belief triggered the stated reporting response?

A: A belief that another lawyer violated Rule 4-7.3.

Background and rules framework

The question cited Rules 4-7.3 and 4-8.3(a); the answer expressly addressed suspected violations of Rule 4-7.3.

Citations and references

Missouri Rules of Professional Conduct:

  • Rule 4-7.3
  • Rule 4-8.3

See also

Source

Original opinion text

Reproduced from the official source for research purposes. The linked source is authoritative.

QUESTION: Attorney´s firm represents creditors in their attempts to collect amounts owed to them by their debtors. Attorney has recently become aware of attorneys who are soliciting those debtors for representation in bankruptcy by sending them a letter. These letters appear to Attorney to be in violation of Rule 4–7.3. Attorney is aware that Attorney is required by Rule 4–8.3(a) to report violations of the Rules of Professional Conduct. Are the potential violations described at a level that should be reported?

ANSWER: If Attorney believes that an attorney has violated the provisions of Rule 4–7.3, Attorney should report that attorney to this office so that we can make an independent determination regarding whether a violation has occurred.

What do the rules say today, for your facts?

This opinion is from 2000. Ezel checks the current Missouri Rules of Professional Conduct against your situation and cites the rules it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace