What expenses could a Missouri lawyer advance for a client in pending or contemplated litigation?

Short answer The opinion limited advances to court costs and expenses directly related to litigation, such as discovery and expert fees. It excluded living, housing, and personal-debt costs and barred routing assistance through a third party.
Bar
MOLEC
Issued
August 30, 1990

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1990. Ask about yours and see what the current Missouri Rules of Professional Conduct say for your facts, with citations.

How much weight this carries: Under Missouri Supreme Court Rule 5.30, formal opinions are binding; informal opinions are advisory. Source.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official ethics opinion. The original opinion (linked on this page) is the authoritative source for any reliance.

Plain-English summary

The committee interpreted former Rule 1.8(e)(1), which permitted a lawyer to advance court costs and litigation expenses with repayment contingent on the matter's outcome.

It confined that category to specific court costs and expenses directly tied to litigation, such as discovery and expert-witness fees. It excluded daily living expenses, housing costs, and payments on personal-property debts.

Rule 8.4 also prevented the lawyer from accomplishing through a third party what the financial-assistance rule prohibited directly.

Currency note

Formal Opinion 119 was adopted in 1990 and updated on January 18, 2022 with an official reference note. That note identifies a November 23, 2021 amendment to Rule 4-1.8 and directs readers to current Rule 4-1.8(e)(3) and Comments 11-13. Treat the original analysis as historical context and verify the current rule.

Common questions

Q: Could the lawyer advance discovery expenses?

A: Yes. The opinion treated discovery costs as expenses directly related to litigation.

Q: Could the lawyer pay the client's rent or daily living costs?

A: No under the opinion's interpretation.

Q: Could a third party provide funds at the lawyer's direction?

A: Not as a way to evade the prohibition. Rule 8.4 barred violations through another person's acts.

Background and rules framework

Former Rule 4-1.8(e)(1) governed financial assistance connected to pending or contemplated litigation. Rule 4-8.4 extended the prohibition to attempted or indirect violations.

Citations and references

Missouri Rules of Professional Conduct:

  • Rule 4-1.8(e)(1)
  • Rule 4-8.4

See also

Source

Original opinion text

Reproduced from the official source for research purposes. The linked source is authoritative.

ADVISORY COMMITTEE
MISSOURI BAR
ADMINISTRATION FORMAL
OPINION #119

Reference Note: Rule 4–1.8, Conflict of Interest: Prohibited Transactions, was amended effective November 23, 2021. This formal opinion predates that amendment and should be read with Rule 4–1.8(e)(3) and Comments [11], [12], and [13].

Question: Does Rule 4 Professional Conduct prohibit a lawyer from advancing any funds other than court costs and expenses of litigation in connection with pending or contemplated litigation?

Answer: A lawyer can advance only court costs and expenses of litigation. Rule 1.8 Conflict of Interest: Prohibited Transactions states at Rule 1.8(e)(1):

1.8(e) A lawyer shall not provide financial assistance to a client in connection with pending or contemplated litigation, except that:

(1) A lawyer may advance court costs and expenses of litigation, the repayment of which may be contingent on the outcome of the matter;...

The Advisory Committee believes that ‘court costs and expenses of litigation’ do not include daily living costs, housing, payments on personal property debts or any expense other than specific court costs and expenses directly related to litigation such as discovery expense and expert witness fees. Further, Rule 8.4 Misconduct, declares that it is professional misconduct for a lawyer to violate, or attempt to violate, the Rules of Professional Conduct through the acts of another. This would prohibit an attorney from providing improper financial assistance to a client through a third party.

Referenced Rules: Rule 1.8(e)(1) of Rule 4.

Rule 8.4 of Rule 4.

Adopted: August 30, 1990

(Updated January 18, 2022, to include Reference Note)

What do the rules say today, for your facts?

This opinion is from 1990. Ezel checks the current Missouri Rules of Professional Conduct against your situation and cites the rules it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace