MNLPRB October 26, 1979

Could a Minnesota lawyer assert a retaining lien on a client's files?

Short answer: No, under this now-repealed opinion: it was professional misconduct to assert a retaining lien on a client's files and papers, and the prohibition reached all retaining liens, whether statutory, common law, contractual, or otherwise.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1979. Ezel answers yours: whether it's allowed on your facts, under the current rules of professional conduct in your state, with citations.

Currency note: this opinion is from 1979
Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later opinions or rule amendments may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.
Disclaimer: Advisory only. Not binding precedent.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official ethics opinion. The original opinion (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ethics opinion (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The opinion addressed the retaining lien, the device by which a lawyer holds a client's files and papers as security for unpaid fees. It concluded that asserting such a lien on a client's files and papers was professional misconduct.

The opinion made the prohibition categorical. It stated that the prohibition applied to all retaining liens, whether statutory, common law, contractual, or otherwise.

Currency note

The Board flagged this opinion as Repealed effective January 26, 2006; it is retained here for historical research only.

This opinion was issued in 1979, before the Minnesota Supreme Court's adoption of the 2005 revisions to the Rules of Professional Conduct. Subsequent rule amendments or later opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current guidance. Verify against current rules before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or requirement mentioned here.

Common questions

Q: Could a Minnesota lawyer hold a client's files until fees were paid?

A: No. The opinion concluded it was professional misconduct to assert a retaining lien on a client's files and papers.

Q: Did the prohibition cover every kind of retaining lien?

A: Yes. The opinion stated it applied to all retaining liens, whether statutory, common law, contractual, or otherwise.

Background and rules framework

The opinion addressed retaining liens on client files and papers, a recurring question about a lawyer's duties regarding client property and files on termination of a representation. It was adopted in 1979 and repealed in 2006. The opinion did not cite a numbered Rule of Professional Conduct.

Citations and references

Rules of Professional Conduct:

  • The opinion cites no Rule of Professional Conduct by number.

See also

Source

Original opinion text

Reproduced from the official source for research purposes. The linked source is authoritative.

LAWYERS PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY BOARD
Repealed: January 26, 2006
OPINION NO. 11
ATTORNEYS’ LIENS
It is professional misconduct for an attorney to assert a retaining lien on the files and
paper of a client. This prohibition applies to all retaining liens, whether they be statutory,
common law, contractual, or otherwise.
Adopted: October 26, 1979.
Repealed: January 26, 2006.

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 1979 opinion on this question. Ezel checks the current rules of professional conduct in your state and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the rules it relies on.