May a West Virginia magistrate operate a part-time LLC selling consumer goods online?

Short answer West Virginia JIC Opinion 2023-08 has no objection to the described LLC if the court's Administrative Director approves it and the magistrate follows Rule 3.1, works on personal time and avoids court resources or title.
Bar
JUDICIAL-WV
Issued
2023

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 2023. Ask about yours and see what the current rules of professional conduct in your state say for your facts, with citations.

Disclaimer: Advisory only. Not binding precedent.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official ethics opinion. The original opinion (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ethics opinion (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A magistrate proposed forming a part-time LLC to sell household goods, pet supplies and electronics through Amazon. The magistrate said the business would not use the judicial title or interfere with judicial duties.

The Commission reviewed West Virginia Code of Judicial Conduct Rule 3.1 on outside activities. Subject to approval by the Supreme Court's Administrative Director, it had no objection if the magistrate complied with that rule, performed the business work on personal time and did not use court resources or judicial position for it.

In practice

The conclusion concerns the described part-time retail venture. It includes administrative approval, separation from judicial time and resources, and no use of judicial office in the business.

Common questions

Q: Does the opinion allow the proposed online store without approval?

A: No. The Commission makes its lack of objection subject to approval by the Supreme Court's Administrative Director.

Q: May the store use the magistrate's judicial title or court equipment?

A: No. The opinion says neither the judicial position nor court resources may be used for the outside business.

Background and rules framework

Rule 3.1(A)-(E) addresses outside activities that interfere with duties, cause disqualification, undermine impartiality, appear coercive or misuse court resources. The opinion applies it to the proposed LLC. The PDF's first-page date is March 9, 2023, while its second-page running header says March 10, 2023; the exact issuance day is therefore left unresolved.

Citations and references

West Virginia Code of Judicial Conduct:

  • Rule 3.1(A)-(E), outside-activity limits.

Source

Original opinion text

Reproduced from the official redacted PDF for research purposes. The linked PDF is authoritative.

JUDICIAL INVESTIGATION COMMISSION
WV Judicial Tower - Suite 700 A
4700 MacCorkle Ave., SE
Charleston, West Virginia 25304
(304) 558-0169

March 9, 2023

Re: JIC Advisory Opinion 2023-08

Dear Magistrate
:

Your request for an advisory opinion to Counsel was recently reviewed by the Judicial Investigation Commission. You are interested in starting a Limited Liability Company (LLC) to sell items through Amazon. You want to sell household items, pet supplies and electronics. Although you have not yet decided on a name for your LLC, you do not plan on referring to your judicial office in any manner. The work associated with the LLC will be part time and you pledge not to let it interfere in any way with your judicial duties. You want to know if you are permitted to engage in this activity.

To address your questions, the Commission has reviewed Rule 3.1 of the Code of Judicial Conduct which states:

Rule 3.1 – Extrajudicial Activities in General

A judge may engage in extrajudicial activities, except as prohibited by law or this Code. However, when engaging in extrajudicial activities, a judge shall not:

(A) participate in activities that will interfere with the proper performance of the judge’s judicial duties;
(B) participate in activities that will lead to frequent disqualification of the judge;

JIC Advisory Opinion 2023-08
March 10, 2023
Page 2 of 2

(C) participate in activities that would appear to a reasonable person to undermine the judge’s independence, integrity or impartiality;
(D) engage in conduct that would appear to a reasonable person to be coercive; or
(E) make use of court premises, staff, stationary, equipment or other resources, except for incidental use for activities that concern the law, the legal, system, or the administration of justice, or unless such additional use is permitted by law.

Subject to the approval of the Administrative Director of the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia, the Commission has no objection to you engaging in such activity so long as you follow the requirements of Rule 3.1 of the Code of Judicial Conduct. You must do the work associated with the LLC on your own time and you must not use any court resources or use your judicial position in connection with the outside employment. The Commission hopes that this opinion fully addresses the issues which you have raised. Please do not hesitate to contact the Commission should you have any questions, comments or concerns.

Sincerely,

Alan D. Moats, Chairperson
Judicial Investigation Commission
ADM/tat

What do the rules say today, for your facts?

This opinion is from 2023. Ezel checks the current rules of professional conduct in your state against your situation and cites the rules it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace