May a magistrate clerk hire someone for an administrative role soon after selling that person a house?

Short answer West Virginia JIC Opinion 2022-22 finds the proposed hiring improper because it could appear that the buyer received the job for using the clerk as a realtor.
Bar
JUDICIAL-WV
Issued
July 27, 2022

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 2022. Ask about yours and see what the current rules of professional conduct in your state say for your facts, with citations.

Disclaimer: Advisory only. Not binding precedent.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official ethics opinion. The original opinion (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ethics opinion (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A magistrate clerk also worked part-time as a realtor and had recently sold a home to a person the clerk wanted to hire for worthless-check and other administrative work. The position was a county job requiring the clerk’s approval. The prospective hire learned of it through the clerk around the real estate transaction rather than through the earlier deputy-clerk posting.

The Commission reviewed Rules 1.2, 2.4(B), 2.12(A) and 2.13(A). It said hiring that person in the proposed manner would appear to reward the buyer for using the clerk as realtor rather than select the best-qualified applicant. It found the hiring improper.

In practice

The opinion concerns this proposed hiring process following the clerk’s own real estate transaction with the candidate.

Common questions

Q: Could the clerk hire the recent realty customer in this manner?

A: No. The Commission found the proposed hiring improper.

Q: What appearance troubled the Commission?

A: It said the hiring could look like a reward for using the clerk as a realtor, rather than a merit-based appointment.

Background and rules framework

Rule 1.2 addresses public confidence and appearance of impropriety; Rule 2.4(B) addresses outside interests; Rule 2.12(A) covers court staff; and Rule 2.13(A) requires impartial administrative appointments without favoritism.

Citations and references

West Virginia Code of Judicial Conduct:

  • Rule 1.2, confidence and appearance of impropriety.
  • Rule 2.4(B), financial and other outside interests.
  • Rule 2.12(A), supervisory duties.
  • Rule 2.13(A)(1), (2), impartial appointments and favoritism.

See also

Source

Original opinion text

Best-effort transcription from a scanned PDF. Minor errors may remain; the linked PDF is authoritative.

JUDICIAL INVESTIGATION COMMISSION
City Center East - Suite 1200 A
4700 MacCorkle Ave., SE
Charleston, West Virginia 25304
(304) 558-0169 • FAX (304) 558-0831

July 27, 2022

Re: JIC Advisory Opinion 2022-22

Dear Mr.

Your request for an advisory opinion to Counsel was recently reviewed by the Judicial Investigation Commission. The factual scenario giving rise to your request is as follows: A magistrate clerk works part-time as a realtor. He/she recently sold a home to an individual and now wants to hire that person part-time to handle worthless checks and other administrative tasks. The worthless check position is considered a county position and not a court position but the hire must be approved by the magistrate clerk before the position can be filled. The individual in question did not apply in response to a job posting for a deputy clerk position which last occurred in or around December 2021. Instead, he/she learned about the position from the magistrate clerk during or soon after the real estate transaction.

You want to know if the magistrate clerk can fill this position in this manner. To address your question the Commission has reviewed Rules 1.2, 2.4(B), 2.12(A) and 2.13(A)(1) and (2) of the Code of Judicial Conduct which state:

Rule 1.2 - Confidence in the Judiciary

A judge shall act at all times in a manner that promotes public confidence in the independence, integrity and impartiality of the judiciary, and shall avoid impropriety and the appearance of impropriety.

JIC Advisory Opinion 2022-22
July 27, 2022
Page 2 of 2

Rule 2.4 - External Influences on Judicial Conduct

(B) A judge shall not permit . . . financial, or other interests or relationships to influence the judge's judicial conduct or judgment.

Rule 2.12-Supervisory Duties

(A) A judge shall require court staff, court officials, and others subject to the judge's direction and control to act in a manner consistent with the judge's obligations under this Code.

Rule 2.13 - Administrative Appointments

(A) In making administrative appointments, a judge:
(1) Shall exercise the power of appointment impartially and on the basis of merit; and
(2) Shall avoid ... favoritism ....

The Commission is of the opinion that it would be improper for the magistrate clerk to hire an individual who he/she just sold a house to in this manner. It creates the appearance, however wrong it may be, that the person is receiving the job simply because he/she used the magistrate clerk as his/her realtor and not because the individual is the best, most qualified candidate for the position.

The Commission hopes that this opinion fully addresses the issues which you have raised. Please do not hesitate to contact the Commission should you have any questions, comments or concerns.

Sincerely,

Judicial Investigation Commission

ADM/tat

What do the rules say today, for your facts?

This opinion is from 2022. Ezel checks the current rules of professional conduct in your state against your situation and cites the rules it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace