May a circuit judge’s administrative assistant keep the court job while running for city council?

Short answer West Virginia JIC Opinion 2022-06 says the assistant must resign judicial employment to become a candidate for the nonjudicial council seat.
Bar
JUDICIAL-WV
Issued
January 12, 2022

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 2022. Ask about yours and see what the current rules of professional conduct in your state say for your facts, with citations.

Disclaimer: Advisory only. Not binding precedent.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official ethics opinion. The original opinion (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ethics opinion (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A requester whom a circuit judge’s administrative assistant had contacted asked whether the assistant could run for city council while keeping the court position.

The Commission reviewed Rule 4.5(A) on judges seeking nonjudicial elective office and Rule 2.12(A) on court staff. It concluded that the assistant could not remain in judicial employment while running for council. The opinion cited three earlier JIC opinions involving other judicial employees and Philyaw v. Gatson on resignation as a reasonable condition of judicial employment.

In practice

The opinion links the resignation requirement to becoming a candidate for nonjudicial public office, including the proposed council race.

Common questions

Q: Could the assistant keep working for the judge while campaigning?

A: No. The Commission said the assistant must resign judicial employment to run.

Q: Did the opinion cite similar judicial-employee decisions?

A: Yes. It cited JIC Opinions 2004-08, 2018-03 and 2018-16, plus Philyaw.

Background and rules framework

Rule 4.5(A) requires a judge seeking nonjudicial elective office to resign, subject to law. Rule 2.12(A) requires a judge to require court staff to act consistently with the judge’s Code obligations. The Commission applied those provisions to the assistant.

Citations and references

West Virginia Code of Judicial Conduct:

  • Rule 4.5(A) and Comment 1, nonjudicial candidacy.
  • Rule 2.12(A) and Comment 1, court staff conduct.

Case cited:

  • Philyaw v. Gatson, 195 W. Va. 474, 466 S.E.2d 133 (1995), judicial-employee resignation on candidacy.

Other opinions cited:

  • JIC Advisory Opinions 2004-08, 2018-03 and 2018-16, judicial employees running for nonjudicial office.

See also

Source

Original opinion text

Best-effort transcription from a scanned PDF. Minor errors may remain; the linked PDF is authoritative.

JUDICIAL INVESTIGATION COMMISSION
City Center East - Suite 1200 A
4700 MacCorkle Ave., SE
Charleston, West Virginia 25304
(304) 558-0169 • FAX (304) 558-0831

January 12, 2022

Re: JIC Advisory Opinion 2022-06

Dear

Your recent request for an advisory opinion was reviewed by the Judicial Investigation Commission. The facts giving rise to your request are as follows: You were recently contacted by an administrative assistant to a circuit judge and asked if he/she can run for the non-judicial position of city councilman/councilwoman. You want to know if this is permissible.

To address your question, the Commission has reviewed Rules 4.5(A) and 2.12(A) of the Code of Judicial Conduct which state:

Rule 4.5 Activities of Judges who Become Candidates for Nonjudicial Office

(A) Upon becoming a candidate for a nonjudicial elective office, a judge shall resign from judicial office, unless permitted by law to continue to hold judicial office.

Rule 2.12 Supervisory Duties

(A) A judge shall require court staff, court officials and others subject to the judge's direction and control to act in a manner consistent with the judge's obligations under this Code.

The Comments to both Rules are also instructive. Comment [1] to Rule 4.5 states in part:

JIC Advisory Opinion 2022-06
January 12, 2022
Page 2 of 2

In campaigns for nonjudicial elective public office, candidates may make pledges, promises or commitments related to positions they would take and ways they would act if elected to office. Although appropriate in nonjudicial campaigns, this manner of campaign is inconsistent with the role of a judge who must remain fair and impartial to all who come before him or her. The potential for misuse of the judicial office and the political promises that the judge would be compelled to make in the course of campaigning for nonjudicial elective office, together dictate that a judge who wishes to run for such an office must resign upon becoming a candidate.

Meanwhile, Comment [1] to Rule 2.12 states:

A judge is responsible for his or her own conduct and for the conduct of others, such as staff, when those persons are acting at the judge's direction or control. A judge may not direct court personnel to engage in conduct on the judge's behalf or as the judge's representative when such conduct would violate the Code if undertaken by the judge.

Based upon this, an administrative assistant to a circuit judge cannot run for a nonjudicial public office without having to resign his/her judicial employment. If the administrative assistant chooses to run for city council he/she cannot keep his/her current position. This decision is consistent with a long line of opinions in which we have held that judicial employees must resign their positions if they decide to run for nonjudicial office. See JIC Advisory Opinion 2004-08 (magistrate assistant must immediately resign his/her position if he/she decides to run for a seat on the county Board of Education); JIC Advisory Opinion 2018-03 (magistrate assistant must immediately resign position if he/she decides to run circuit clerk); and JIC Advisory Opinion 2018-16 (law clerk must immediately resign his/her position if he/she decides to run for a nonjudicial public office). See also Philyaw v. Gatson, 195 W. Va. 474, 466 S.E.2d 133 (1995) (the requirement that a magistrate assistant must resign judicial office upon becoming a candidate for circuit clerk is a reasonable condition of judicial employment).

We hope that this opinion fully addresses the issue which you have raised. Please do not hesitate to contact the Commission should you have any questions, comments or concerns or desire additional advice.

Sincerely,

Judicial Investigation Commission
ADM/tat

What do the rules say today, for your facts?

This opinion is from 2022. Ezel checks the current rules of professional conduct in your state against your situation and cites the rules it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace