May a judge’s law clerk work weekends at a winery in another judicial circuit?

Short answer West Virginia JIC Opinion 2021-13 permits the described part-time winery work because it occurs on weekends and potential winery cases belong elsewhere, but requires the court administrator’s written approval first.
Bar
JUDICIAL-WV
Issued
June 4, 2021

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 2021. Ask about yours and see what the current rules of professional conduct in your state say for your facts, with citations.

Disclaimer: Advisory only. Not binding precedent.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official ethics opinion. The original opinion (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ethics opinion (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A judge’s law clerk asked to help family friends at a winery in a different judicial circuit on weekends. The proposed work included production, tastings, sales and events.

The Commission reviewed Rule 3.1 and found no Code violation because the clerk would work only on weekends and any winery-related matters would fall in another jurisdiction. It required written approval from the Supreme Court’s Administrative Director before the clerk accepted the position.

In practice

The permission is conditional: the clerk must obtain the identified written approval before taking the weekend job.

Common questions

Q: Could the clerk work at the winery?

A: Yes, on the stated weekend and separate-jurisdiction facts, with written approval first.

Q: Who had to approve the job?

A: The opinion requires written approval from Joe Armstrong, Administrative Director of the Supreme Court of Appeals.

Background and rules framework

Rule 3.1(A)-(E) governs outside activities and limits interference, disqualification, coercion and court-resource use. The Commission applied it to the clerk’s proposed weekend job.

Citations and references

West Virginia Code of Judicial Conduct:

  • Rule 3.1(A)-(E) and Comment 1, outside activities.

See also

Source

Original opinion text

Best-effort transcription from a scanned PDF. Minor errors may remain; the linked PDF is authoritative.

JUDICIAL INVESTIGATION COMMISSION
City Center East - Suite 1200 A
4700 MacCorkle Ave., SE
Charleston, West Virginia 25304
(304) 558-0169 • FAX (304) 558-0831

June 4, 2021

Re: JIC Advisory Opinion 2021-13

Dear Judge

Your request for an advisory opinion to Counsel was recently reviewed by the Judicial Investigation Commission. The factual scenario giving rise to your request is as follows:

Your law clerk lives in a different judicial circuit from where she works. The law clerk's neighbors, who are her close family friends, have opened a winery on the farm next to where she lives. The law clerk would like to work weekends at the winery. The law clerk's tasks would include assisting with pruning, picking, bottling, labeling, and cleaning. She would help with wine tastings for customers and wine or merchandise sales. The winery is also planning to operate as a wedding venue and the law clerk would also help in that regard. She would perform these tasks for a few hours on Saturdays or Sundays when they need extra hands. The winery is open from 1-6 p.m. Saturdays and Sundays. Based upon information and belief~ the owners have a drink limit policy in place for customers.

You want to know if it would violate the Code of Judicial Conduct for your clerk to engage in this outside employment. To address your question, the Commission has viewed Rule 3 .1 of the Code of Judicial Conduct which provides:

Rule 3.1 - Extrajudicial Activities in General

A judge may engage in extrajudicial activities, except as prohibited by law or this Code. However, when engaging in extrajudicial activities, a judge shall not:

JIC Advisory Opinion 2021-13
June 4, 2021
Page 2 of 2

(A) participate in activities that will interfere with the proper performance of the judge's judicial duties;
(B) participate in activities that will lead to frequent disqualification of the judge;
(C) participate in activities that would appear to a reasonable person to undermine the judge's independence, integrity, or impartiality;
(D) engage in conduct that would appear to a reasonable person to be coercive; or
(E) make use of court premises, staff, stationery, equipment, or other resources, except for incidental use for activities that concern the law, the legal system, or the administration of justice, or unless such additional use is permitted by law.

Comment [1] to the Rule states that "to the extent that time permits, and judicial independence and impartiality are not compromised, judges are encouraged to engage in appropriate extrajudicial activities."

Based upon the foregoing, the Commission is of the opinion that your clerk's part-time employment with the winery would not violate this Rule or any other provision of the Code since she would only work on the weekends and any potential matters involving the winery would be subject to a different jurisdiction. Importantly, before your clerk can accept the part-time position, she must have the written approval of Joe Armstrong, Administrative Director of the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia.

The Commission hopes that this opinion fully addresses the issues which you have raised. Please do not hesitate to contact the Commission should you have any questions, comments or concerns.

Sincerely,

Judicial Investigation Commission

ADM/tat

cc: Administrative Director Joe Armstrong

What do the rules say today, for your facts?

This opinion is from 2021. Ezel checks the current rules of professional conduct in your state against your situation and cites the rules it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace