May a justice recruit people for an endowment fundraising committee without personally soliciting donations?

Short answer West Virginia JIC Opinion 2020-03 permits recruiting lawyers and others for the committee, but requires disclosure of relationships with its members in pending court matters.
Bar
JUDICIAL-WV
Issued
January 29, 2020

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 2020. Ask about yours and see what the current rules of professional conduct in your state say for your facts, with citations.

Currency note: this opinion is from 2020
Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later opinions or rule amendments may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.
Disclaimer: Advisory only. Not binding precedent.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official ethics opinion. The original opinion (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ethics opinion (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A justice funded an endowment for a law school clinic and asked whether the justice could recruit others, including lawyers, for a committee to seek further donations. The justice would not personally request money.

The Commission applied Rule 3.7 and permitted the justice to ask people to serve on the committee. It also required disclosure under Rule 2.11 of the relationship with any lawyer or nonlawyer committee member involved in a pending matter before the Court.

In practice

The opinion permits committee recruitment, while linking committee-member appearances in court to Rule 2.11 disclosure.

Common questions

Q: May the justice recruit committee members?

A: Yes. The Commission permitted requests for lawyers and others to serve on the fundraising committee.

Q: What if a committee member is involved in a pending case?

A: The Commission said the justice should disclose that relationship under Rule 2.11.

Background and rules framework

Rule 3.7(A), subject to Rule 3.1, describes permitted involvement with nonprofit educational and legal organizations while limiting personal solicitation of contributions. The Commission also invokes Rule 2.11 for disclosure in cases involving committee members.

Citations and references

West Virginia Code of Judicial Conduct:

  • Rule 3.7(A)(1)-(3), (5), nonprofit participation and fundraising.
  • Rule 3.1, general limits on outside activities.
  • Rule 2.11, disclosure in cases involving committee members.

See also

Source

Original opinion text

Best-effort transcription from a scanned PDF. Minor errors may remain; the linked PDF is authoritative.

JUDICIAL INVESTIGATION COMMISSION
City Center East - Suite 1200 A
4700 MacCorkle Ave. , SE
Charleston, West Virginia 25304
(304) 558-0169 • FAX (304) 558-0831

January 29, 2020

Re: .TIC Advisory Opinion 2020-03.

Dear Justice

Your recent request for an advisory opinion was reviewed by the Judicial Investigation Commission. The factual scenario giving rise to your request is as follows:

You have established and are providing multi-year funding for an endowment to the College of Law to benefit the Child and Family Advocacy Law Clinic. The endowment was created in memory of one of your children who passed away, and it will be held, managed and used by the Foundation for the benefit of the clinic. The Clinic provides pro bono legal services to children and families oflimited income to promote their health, security and future success. The C linic is directed by a law professor and staffed with student-attorneys.

You want to know if you are permitted pursuant to Rule 3.7 of the Code of Judicial Conduct to assist the fund by requesting other persons, including lawyers, to serve on a committee that would seek additional funding for the endowment through contributions. You state that you would not be making any direct requests for funding. You would only be requesting the names of others to serve on a committee that would request funding.

Rule 3. 7 provides in pertinent part:

(A) Subject to the requirements of Rule 3.1, a judge may participate in activities sponsored by organizations or governmental entities concerned with the law, the legal system, or the administration ofjustice, and those sponsored by or on behalf of educational, religious

JIC Adviso,y Opinion 2020-03
Januaiy 29, 2020
Page 2 of2

charitable, fraternal, or civie organizations not conducted for profit, including but not limited to the fo llowing activities:

(I) assisting such an organization or entity in the management and investment of the organization's or entity's funds;
(2) soliciting conttibutions for such an organization or entity, but only from members of the judge's family, or from judges over whom the judge does not exercise supervisory or appellate authority;
(3) soliciting membership for such an organization or entity, even though the membership dues or fees generated may be used to support the objectives of the organization or entity, but only if the organization or entity is concerned with the law, the legal system or the administration of justice;

(5) making recommendations to such a public or private fund-granting organization or entity in connection with its programs and activities, but only if the organization or entity is concerned with the law, the legal system, or the administration of justice;

Based upon the foregoing, the Commission finds that you may assist the fund by requesting other persons, including lawyers, to serve on a committee that would seek additional funding for the endowment through contributions. However, the Commission is also of the opinion that you should disclose the nature ofthe relationship with the lawyers or non-lawyers pursuant to Rule 2.11 of the Code of Judicial Conduct in any pending matter before the Court involving any endowment conunittee member.

[tis hoped that this opinion fully addresses the issues which you have raised. lf there is any fu1ther question regarding this matter do not hesitate to contact the Commission.

Sincerely,

(l~yj-11~
Alan D. Moats, Chairperson
Judicial Investigation Commission
ADM/tat

What do the rules say today, for your facts?

This opinion is from 2020. Ezel checks the current rules of professional conduct in your state against your situation and cites the rules it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace