May a circuit judge candidate remain president of a plaintiffs’ lawyers association during the campaign?

Short answer West Virginia JIC Opinion 2018-05 requires the candidate to resign immediately as president of the West Virginia Association for Justice while running for circuit judge.
Bar
JUDICIAL-WV
Issued
February 7, 2018

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 2018. Ask about yours and see what the current rules of professional conduct in your state say for your facts, with citations.

Currency note: this opinion is from 2018
Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later opinions or rule amendments may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.
Disclaimer: Advisory only. Not binding precedent.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official ethics opinion. The original opinion (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ethics opinion (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A circuit judge candidate was president of the West Virginia Association for Justice, with a term scheduled to end after the election. The candidate asked whether both roles could continue at once.

The Commission described the association as a group advocating for plaintiffs and their lawyers, with educational programs generally directed to plaintiffs’ counsel and membership limits for defense practices. It found simultaneous leadership and candidacy inconsistent with judicial impartiality and directed immediate resignation from the presidency.

In practice

The opinion requires immediate resignation from the association presidency during the circuit judge campaign.

Common questions

Q: Could the candidate serve out the association term during the election?

A: No. The Commission required immediate resignation.

Q: What feature of the group mattered?

A: The opinion described its plaintiff-side advocacy and membership rules as bearing on the candidate’s appearance of impartiality.

Background and rules framework

The Commission considered Rule 1.2 on public confidence and Rules 4.1(A)(1) and 4.2(A)(1) on campaign activity and judicial impartiality.

Citations and references

West Virginia Code of Judicial Conduct:

  • Rule 1.2, public confidence and appearance of impropriety.
  • Rule 4.1(A)(1), leadership or office in a political organization.
  • Rule 4.2(A)(1), integrity and impartiality during public elections.

See also

Source

Original opinion text

Best-effort transcription from a scanned PDF. Minor errors may remain; the linked PDF is authoritative.

JUDICIAL INVESTIGATION COMMISSION
City Center East - Suite 1200 A
4700 MacCorkle Ave., SE
Charleston, West Virginia 25304
(304) 558-0169 • FAX (304) 558-0831

February 7, 2018

Re: JIC Advisory Opinion 2018-05.

Dear

Your recent request for an advisory opinion was reviewed by the Judicial Investigation Commission. You are running in the May 2018 Election for the position of Circuit Judge in the Judicial Circuit. You currently serve as President of the West Virginia Association for Justice. Your term as President is scheduled to end in June 2018. You want to know if you can keep your position as President and contemporaneously run for Circuit Court Judge.

To address the questions, the Commission has reviewed Rules 1.2 and 4.1(A)(1) and 4.2(A)(1) of the Code of Judicial Conduct which provide:

Rule 1.2

A judge shall act at all times in a manner that promotes public confidence in the independence, integrity, and impartiality of the judiciary, and shall avoid impropriety and the appearance of impropriety.

Rule 4.1 – Political and Campaign Activities of Judges and Judicial Candidates in General

(A) Except as permitted by law, or by Rules 4.2, 4.3 and 4.4, a judge or a judicial candidate shall not:
(1) act as a leader in, or hold an office, in, a political organization;

JIC Advisory Opinion 2018-05
February 7, 2018
Page 2 of 2

Rule 4.2 -- Political and Campaign Activities of Judicial Candidates in Public Elections

(A) A judge or candidate subject to public election shall:

(1) act at all times in a manner consistent with the independence, integrity, and impartiality of the judiciary;

The Commission recognizes that the West Virginia Association for Justice is a non-profit Association that is seen as a partisan group advocating for laws benefitting plaintiffs and their attorneys. Young and experienced lawyers, representing both plaintiffs and defendants, have benefited from its outstanding educational programs – but, historically, the educational programs have been generally geared to improving the skills of plaintiffs’ lawyers. The commission, in support of its position also notes that its membership application requires that an applicant for membership has to certify that his or her practice – and the practice of the firm for which the applicant is affiliated – “does not include the defense of personal injury claims, wrongful death claims, workers compensation claims and/or the representation of other interest adverse to consumers, workers and the mission of the West Virginia Association for Justice.”

While the Commission has great respect for the organization and recognizes that, when they practiced law, a number of our circuit court judges have benefited from your educational programs, it believes that it would be improper for a judicial candidate, who must at all times act in a manner consistent with the impartiality of the judiciary, to contemporaneously serve as the group’s president while also running for the position of Circuit Court Judge.

Based upon the foregoing, the Commission is of the opinion that you must immediately resign your position as president of the West Virginia Association for Justice. If there is any further question regarding this matter do not hesitate to contact the Commission.

Sincerely,

Ronald E. Wilson, Chairperson
Judicial Investigation Commission

REW/tat

What do the rules say today, for your facts?

This opinion is from 2018. Ezel checks the current rules of professional conduct in your state against your situation and cites the rules it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace