May a judge accept appointment to a public university’s board of governors?

Short answer West Virginia JIC Opinion 2017-18 rejects the appointment under the state constitutional bar on another public-trust office and Judicial Conduct Rule 3.4.
Bar
JUDICIAL-WV
Issued
August 22, 2017

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 2017. Ask about yours and see what the current rules of professional conduct in your state say for your facts, with citations.

Currency note: this opinion is from 2017
Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later opinions or rule amendments may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.
Disclaimer: Advisory only. Not binding precedent.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official ethics opinion. The original opinion (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ethics opinion (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A judge asked whether service on a university board of governors was permitted. The governor appointed board members under state law.

The Commission found the appointment incompatible with West Virginia Constitution Article VIII, § 7, which bars judges from another governmental public-trust appointment, and Rule 3.4, which restricts appointments to governmental boards to those concerning law, the legal system or administration of justice.

In practice

The opinion bars the specified gubernatorial appointment to the university board.

Common questions

Q: May the judge join the university board?

A: No. The Commission found the appointment barred by the state constitution and Rule 3.4.

Q: Why did Rule 3.4 matter?

A: The board was not a governmental position concerning law, the legal system or the administration of justice.

Background and rules framework

Rule 3.4 limits governmental board appointments for judges. The opinion applies that rule alongside West Virginia Constitution Article VIII, § 7 and identifies W. Va. Code § 18B-2A-1 et seq. as the source of the governor’s appointment authority.

Citations and references

West Virginia Code of Judicial Conduct:

  • Rule 3.4, governmental appointments.

Constitution:

  • W. Va. Const. art. VIII, § 7, other governmental offices and public-trust appointments.

Statutes:

  • W. Va. Code § 18B-2A-1 et seq., university board appointments.

See also

Source

Original opinion text

Best-effort transcription from a scanned PDF. Minor errors may remain; the linked PDF is authoritative.

JUDICIAL INVESTIGATION COMMISSION
City Center East - Suite 1200 A
4700 MacCorkle Ave., SE
Charleston, West Virginia 25304
(304) 558- 0169 • FAX (304) 558-0831

August 22, 2017

Re: JIC Advisory Opinion 2017-18.

Dear

Your recent request for an advisory opinion to Counsel was reviewed by the Judicial Investigation Commission. You want to know if you can serve on the Board of Governors for University. Pursuant to W. Va. Code§ 18B-2A-l, et seq., the Governor makes all appointments to the School's Board of Governors.

To address the question which you have raised, the Commission reviewed the Constitution of West Virginia, Article VIII,§ 7, which provides in pertinent part:

No justice, judge or magistrate shall hold any other office, or accept any other appointment for public trust, under this or any other government; . ..

The Commission also reviewed Rule 3.4 of the Code ofJudicial Conduct which states that "[a] judge shall not accept appointment to a governmental committee, board, commission or other governmental position, unless it is one that concerns the law, the legal system or the administration of justice."

Based upon the foregoing, it is the position of the Judicial Investigation Commission that you cannot serve on the School's Board of Governors because such an appointment would violate the Constitution of West Virginia, Aiticle VIII, § 7 and Rule 3.4 of the Code of Judicial Conduct.

It is hoped that this opinion fully addresses the issues which you have raised.
If there is any further question regarding this or any other matter do not hesitate to

JI C Advisory Opinion 20 17- 18
August 22, 20 17
Page 2 of2

contact the Commission.

Sincerely,

Ronald E. Wilson, Chairperson
Judicial Investigation Commission

REW/tat

What do the rules say today, for your facts?

This opinion is from 2017. Ezel checks the current rules of professional conduct in your state against your situation and cites the rules it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace