May an incoming family judge remain on boards for a group home, housing partnership and campus ministry?

Short answer A majority in West Virginia JIC Opinion 2016-29 permits continued service on all three boards on the stated facts, with judicial duties taking priority.
Bar
JUDICIAL-WV
Issued
December 1, 2016

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 2016. Ask about yours and see what the current rules of professional conduct in your state say for your facts, with citations.

Currency note: this opinion is from 2016
Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later opinions or rule amendments may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.
Disclaimer: Advisory only. Not binding precedent.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official ethics opinion. The original opinion (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ethics opinion (PDF)

Plain-English summary

An incoming family judge held board roles at a boys’ group home, a community housing organization and a campus ministry. The request described no contact with group-home residents, housing organization property owners, funders or renters, or students.

A Commission majority permitted the three board roles under Rules 3.1 and 3.7(A)(2), (6). It reminded the judge that judicial duties take precedence over board activities.

In practice

The opinion permits the three described board roles subject to judicial-duty priority and the cited Code limits.

Common questions

Q: May the judge remain on all three boards?

A: Yes. A Commission majority permitted the proposed service.

Q: What priority did the opinion identify?

A: Judicial duties take precedence over the board activities.

Background and rules framework

Rule 3.1 limits outside activities that interfere with judicial work or impartiality. Rule 3.7(A)(2), (6) governs fundraising solicitation and service as a nonprofit officer or director.

Citations and references

West Virginia Code of Judicial Conduct:

  • Rule 3.1(A)-(C), outside activities.
  • Rule 3.7(A)(2), (6), nonprofit solicitation and board service.

See also

Source

Original opinion text

Best-effort transcription from a scanned PDF. Minor errors may remain; the linked PDF is authoritative.

-~itf.~;l1\
•i
~:.~trtt~,f:~i''

JUDICIAL INVESTIGATION COMMISSION
City Center East - Suite 1200 A
4700 MacCorkle Ave., SE
Charleston, West Virginia 25304
(304) 558-0169 • FAX (304) 558-0831

December 1, 2016

Re: nc Advisory Opinion 2016-29.
Dear

Your recent request for an advisory opinion was reviewed by· the Judicial Investigation Commission. The factual scenario giving rise to your request is as follows: In May 2016, you were elected Judge of the 19th Family Court Circuit. You will take the bench on January 1, 2017. You currently serve on several boards and want to know if you can continue doing so after you become judge . You are President of the Board of Directors of
a group home for boys age 12-18. You do not have any contact with the residents, nor do you know who the residents are. The majority of the contact you have with the BoaTd is with the Executive Director who is a resident of a different county and therefore would not likely come before you. You are a check signer for the mganization which requires two signatures on each check. You do not make out any checks and are not responsible for any disbursement of funds.

You are also on the Board of Directors of the Community Development Partnership, an organization that deals with affordable housing in targeted areas of the community. You do not have contact with any of the property owners, banking institutions, funders, or renters. Finally, you are on the Board of the Foundation, a United Methodist
Ministry on the Campus of University and Community and Technical
College. You have no contact with any of the students, just the campus minister and the other board members.

The Commission has reviewed Rules 3.1, 3.7(A)(2), and 3.7(A)(6) of the Code of Judicial Conduct to address the question which you have raised:

JIC Advisory Opinion 2016-29
December I, 20 I 6
Page 2 of3

Rule 3.1 Extrajudicial Activities in General

A judge may engage in extrajudicial activities, except as prohibited by law or this Code. However, when engaging in extrajudicial activities, a judge shall not:

(A) participate in activities that will interfere with the proper performance of the judge's judicial duties;

(B) participate in activities that will lead to frequent disqualification of the judge;

(C) pmticipate in activities that would appear to a reasonable person to undermine the judge's independence, integrity, or impartiality;

Rule 3. 7 Participation in Educational, Religious, Charitable, Fraternal, or Civic Organizations and Activities

(A) Subject to the requirements of Rule 3.1, a judge may participate in activities sponsored by organizations or governmental entities concerned with the law, the legal system, or the administration of justice, and those sponsored by or on behalf of educational, religious, charitable, fraternal, or civic organizations not conducted for profit, including but not limited to the following activities:

(2) soliciting contributions for such an organization or entity, but only from members of the judge's family, or from judges over whom the judge does not exercise supervisory or appellate authority;

(6) serving as an officer, director, trustee, or nonlegal advisor of such an organization or entity, unless it is likely that the organization or entity:

(a) will be engaged in proceedings that would ordinarily come before the judge; or

(b) will frequently be engaged in adversary proceedings in the court of

JIC Advisory Opinion 2016-29
December 1, 2016
Page 3 of3

which the judge is a member, or in any comt subject to the appellate jurisdiction of the court of which the judge is a member

Based on the foregoing, a majority of the Commission believes that you may continue to serve on the boards as requested. However, you are reminded that your judicial duties must take precedence over all of your extracurricular activities.

We hope this opinion fully addresses the issues which you have raised. If there is any further question regarding this matter do not hesitate to contact the Commission.

Sincerely,

/?~tA-__
Ronald E. Wilson, Chairperson
Judicial Investigation Commission

REW/bjl

What do the rules say today, for your facts?

This opinion is from 2016. Ezel checks the current rules of professional conduct in your state against your situation and cites the rules it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace