May a probation officer who works under circuit judges donate to a judicial campaign committee?
Apply this to your situation
This page answers the general question as of 2016. Ask about yours and see what the current rules of professional conduct in your state say for your facts, with citations.
Plain-English summary
The Commission was asked whether a probation officer could contribute to a judicial campaign. Circuit judges selected and directed probation officers in cases, though chief officers provided day-to-day supervision.
The Commission applied Rules 1.2, 2.12(A), 4.1(A)(5) and 4.1(B). It concluded that a probation officer should not donate to the campaign committee of a judge or judicial candidate.
In practice
The opinion rejects the described donation by a probation officer working under judges’ direction.
Common questions
Q: May the probation officer make the contribution?
A: The Commission concluded the officer should not donate to the judicial campaign committee.
Q: Why did judicial supervision matter?
A: The opinion described probation officers as serving at judges’ pleasure and taking their direction on cases.
Background and rules framework
Rule 2.12(A) requires judges to ensure court staff act consistently with judicial obligations; Rule 4.1(A)(5) restricts judicial candidate contributions and Rule 4.1(B) addresses prohibited acts by others on the candidate’s behalf. The opinion also cites Rule 1.2.
Citations and references
West Virginia Code of Judicial Conduct:
- Rules 1.2, 2.12(A), 4.1(A)(5) and 4.1(B), staff conduct and campaign activity.
See also
Source
- Landing page: West Virginia Judicial Investigation Commission advisory opinions
- Original PDF: JIC Advisory Opinion 2016-09, redacted
Original opinion text
Best-effort transcription from a scanned PDF. Minor errors may remain; the linked PDF is authoritative.
JUDICIAL INVESTIGATION COMMISSION
City Center East - Suite 1200 A
4700 MacCorkle Ave., SE
Charleston, West Vlrginia 25304
(304) 55B-0169 • FAX (304) 556-0831
Marth 8, 2016
Re: JIC Advisory Opinion 2016-09.
Dear
Your request for an advisory opinion to Counsel was recently reviewed by the Judicial Investigation Commission. The factual scenario giving rise to your request is as follows: You want to know if a probation officer can make a campaign donation to a judicial candidate's campaign committee? Circuit Judges are responsible for hiring probation officers. The Circuit Judges interview for the position and recommend a finalist to the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia. Upon successful completion of a background check, the Supreme Court employs the finalist and pays his/her salary. Probation officers serve at" the will and pleasure of the Circuit Judges. Probation officers are in court almost daily and take direction from the judges on cases. However, the Chief Probation Officer and a Deputy Chief Probation Officer provide day to day supervision.
To address the questions which you have raised, the Commission has reviewed Rules 1.2, 2.12{A), 4.l(a}(S) and 4.l(BI of the Code of Judicial Conduct. Rule 1.2 states that "[a] judge shall act at all times in a manner that promotes public confidence in the independence, integrity, and impartiality of the judiciary, and shall avoid impropriety and the appearance of impropriety." Rule 2.12(A) provides that "[a] judge shall require court staff, court officials and others subject to the judge's direction and control to act in a manner consistent with the judge's obligations under this Code."
JIC Advisory Opinion 2016-09
March 8, 2016
Page2 of2
Importantly, Rule 4.1(A)(5) states that "a Judge or a judicial candidate shall not make a contribution to a candidate for public office. Lastly, Rule 4.l(B) provides that "[a] judge or judicial candidate shall take reasonable measures_ to ensure that other persons do not undertake, on behalf of the judge or judicial candidate, any activities prohibited under paragraph (A)."
Based upon the foregoing, the Commission is of the opinion that a probation officer should not donate to the campaign committee of a judge or judicial candidate. The Commission hopes that this opinion fully addresses the issues which you have raised. Please do not hesitate to contact the Commission should you have any questions, comments or concerns.
Ronald E. Wilson, Chairperson
Judicial Investigation Commission
REW/tat
What do the rules say today, for your facts?
This opinion is from 2016. Ezel checks the current rules of professional conduct in your state against your situation and cites the rules it relies on.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace