How long should a judge disclose that an appearing attorney once represented the judge?

Short answer West Virginia JIC Opinion 2010-14 recommends disclosure when the attorney appears, without setting an end date for that practice.
Bar
JUDICIAL-WV
Issued
October 5, 2010

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 2010. Ask about yours and see what the current rules of professional conduct in your state say for your facts, with citations.

Currency note: this opinion is from 2010
Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later opinions or rule amendments may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.
Disclaimer: Advisory only. Not binding precedent.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official ethics opinion. The original opinion (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ethics opinion (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A judge asked how long to disclose that a regularly appearing attorney had represented the judge in earlier litigation. The Commission reviewed former Canons 2A and 3E(1) and said the safe practice was to disclose the prior representation whenever that attorney appeared. It did not provide a fixed duration or decide automatic recusal.

In practice

The advice is repeated disclosure of the past representation; the opinion gives no sunset period.

Common questions

Q: What disclosure practice did the Commission recommend?

A: Disclose the prior representation when the attorney appears.

Q: Did it specify how many years to continue?

A: No fixed end date appears in the opinion.

Q: Did it order recusal from all of the attorney’s cases?

A: No. It recommended disclosure and quoted the disqualification standard.

Background and rules framework

Former Canon 2A addresses appearance of impropriety; Canon 3E(1) addresses disqualification when impartiality might reasonably be questioned.

Citations and references

West Virginia Code of Judicial Conduct (former): Canons 2A and 3E(1).

See also

Source

Original opinion text

Best-effort transcription from a scanned PDF. Minor errors may remain; the linked PDF is authoritative.

JUDICIAL INVESTIGATION COMMISSION
Post Office Box 1629
Charleston, West Virginia 25326-1629
(304) 558-0169 © FAX (304) 558-0831

October 5, 2010

Re: JIC Advisory Opinion 2010-14

Dear Judge

Your recent request for an advisory opinion was reviewed by the Judicial Investigation Commission at its meeting. In that request you stated that an attorney who appears in front of you on a regular basis had previously represented you in litigation and you asked for how long you should disclose that fact when the attorney is in your court.

To address this question the Commission has reviewed Canon 2 and Canon 3 of the Code of Judicial Conduct. Canon 2 states in relevant part:

Canon 2. A judge shall avoid impropriety and the appearance of impropriety in all of the judge’s activities.

A. A judge shall respect and comply with the law, shall avoid impropriety and the appearance of impropriety in all of the judge’s activities, and shall act at all times in a manner that promotes public confidence in the integrity and impartiality of the judiciary.

Canon 3 states in relevant part:

Canon 3. A judge shall perform the duties of judicial office impartially and diligently.

E. Disqualification. (1) A judge shall disqualify himself or herself in a proceeding in which the judge’s impartiality might reasonably be questioned, .. .

Based upon the relevant language contaiiied in these Canons, it is the opinion of the Commission that the safe practice for you is to disclose the prior representation by the attorney when he appears in your court. October 5, 2010 Page Two

It is hoped that this opinion fully addresses the question which you have raised. If you have any further question regarding this matter do not hesitate to contact the Commission.

Very truly yours,
[signature]

Ronald E. Wilson, Vice-Chairperson
Judicial Investigation Commission

REW:nb

What do the rules say today, for your facts?

This opinion is from 2010. Ezel checks the current rules of professional conduct in your state against your situation and cites the rules it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace