May an incoming circuit judge remain in a federal appeal after taking office to transfer it, and prepare affidavits later for work done as a lawyer?

Short answer West Virginia JIC Opinion 2008-15 requires the incoming judge to leave the appeal entirely before taking office but permits later fee petitions and affidavits supporting legal work completed beforehand.
Bar
JUDICIAL-WV
Issued
November 25, 2008

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 2008. Ask about yours and see what the current rules of professional conduct in your state say for your facts, with citations.

Currency note: this opinion is from 2008
Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later opinions or rule amendments may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.
Disclaimer: Advisory only. Not binding precedent.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official ethics opinion. The original opinion (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ethics opinion (PDF)

Plain-English summary

An attorney about to become a circuit judge asked whether they could stay in a federal appeal temporarily after January 1, 2009 to wind it down. They also asked about preparing fee affidavits after that date for work completed by December 31, 2008 in several fee-shifting cases.

Applying former Canon 4G’s prohibition on the practice of law, the Commission directed the attorney to arrange replacement counsel and leave the appeal entirely before assuming judicial duties. It permitted preparation after taking office of fee petitions and supporting affidavits for legal work performed before taking office.

In practice

The opinion separates continued representation, which it rejected, from later documentation of previously earned fees, which it permitted.

Common questions

Q: Could the incoming judge remain in the appeal to transfer it after taking office?

A: No. The Commission directed complete withdrawal before January 1, 2009.

Q: Could fee affidavits be prepared after taking office?

A: Yes, for work performed before December 31, 2008.

Q: Which former Code provision governed?

A: Canon 4G, which prohibited a judge from practicing law.

Background and rules framework

Former Canon 4G barred a judge from practicing law, with limited exceptions for self-representation and uncompensated family assistance.

Citations and references

West Virginia Code of Judicial Conduct (former): Canon 4G.

See also

Source

Original opinion text

Best-effort transcription from a scanned PDF. Minor errors may remain; the linked PDF is authoritative.

JUDICIAL INVESTIGATION COMMISSION
Post Office Box 1629
Charleston, West Virginia 25326-1629
(304) 558-0169 ° FAX (304) 558-0831

November 25, 2008

Re: JIC Advisory Opinion 2008-15

Dear

In a recent letter to the Judicial Investigation Commission you asked for an advisory opinion regarding certain questions about winding down cases in order to begin your new position as a circuit judge. You asked whether you could remain in a federal case for the sole purpose of winding it down and transferring it to new counsel after January 1, 2009. You also asked whether you could prepare a fee affidavit after January 1, 2009 to document legal work and fees earned prior to December 31, 2008.

To address the questions which you have raised the Commission has reviewed Canon 4 of the Code of Judicial Conduct. Canon 4G states:

Canon 4. A judge shall so conduct the judge’s extra-judicial activities as to minimize the risk of conflict with judicial obligations.

G. Practice of law. A judge shall not practice law. Notwithstanding this prohibition, a judge may act pro se and may, without compensation, give legal advice to and draft or review documents for a member of the judge’s family.

In your correspondence you indicate that the federal case about which you are inquiring pertained to an appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It is scheduled for oral argument on December 2. You represent the appellant/plaintiff and the Federal District Court granted summary judgement for the defendants. You state that if the Fourth Circuit upholds the District Court then there would be nothing more for you to do on the case. Based upon the language set forth in Canon 4G, it is the opinion of the Commission that you should line up other counsel and otherwise remove yourself from that case entirely prior to January 1, 2009, when you will assume your duties as Circuit Judge.

November 25, 2008
Page Two

You further indicate in your correspondence that you are involved in four cases pending in the federal court and one case pending in the state court involving fee-shifting statutes where fees may be awarded by the court if the plaintiff whom you represent prevails. You will transfer those cases to new counsel who will enter their appearance and take them over prior to January 1, 2009. However, you would like to be able to prepare fee affidavits after January 1, 2009, to show the work you have done in the cases and fees you have earned up to December 31, 2008. Since the fees are not awarded in these cases unless the plaintiff ultimately prevails you do not want to be burdened with extra work prior December 31, 2008, when you need to be winding down other cases. It is the opinion of the Commission that you could prepare fee petitions and other affidavits to support the work you have done prior to December 31, 2008, so that you could be compensated for the work you engaged in prior to that date. You could prepare these petitions and other support documents after January 1, 2009.

It is hoped that this opinion fully addresses the question which you have raised. If you have any other question regarding this matter do not hesitate to contact the Commission.

Very truly yours,
[signature]

Fred L. Fox, II, Chairperson
Judicial Investigation Commission

FLF:nb

What do the rules say today, for your facts?

This opinion is from 2008. Ezel checks the current rules of professional conduct in your state against your situation and cites the rules it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace