May a retired judge on senior active status serve as an alternate on a town planning or zoning board?
Apply this to your situation
This page answers the general question as of 2010. Ask about yours and see what the current rules of professional conduct in your state say for your facts, with citations.
Plain-English summary
A retired judge serving in senior active status asked whether he could accept appointment as an alternate on a town planning board or zoning board of adjustment.
The Committee said Section 4C(2) would bar this governmental position for a regular judge, but the Code treated a senior active judge as part time and exempted part time judges from that section.
The judge could not hear an appeal of a board decision in which he participated. The Committee also said he should decline any matter involving the board on which he sat, even if he had not participated in the particular decision. It left other town related disqualification questions for individual cases.
Common questions
Q: Does Section 4C(2) bar the senior active judge from joining the board?
A: No. The Committee said the part time judge exemption allowed the appointment.
Q: Could the judge hear an appeal from a board decision in which he participated?
A: No. The opinion cited the disqualification rule for personal knowledge of disputed facts.
Q: What if the judge did not participate in a board decision?
A: The Committee still said he should decline any matter involving the board on which he sits as an alternate.
Background and rules framework
The opinion applied the then effective New Hampshire Code of Judicial Conduct Sections 4C(2) and 3E, plus the Application of the Code provisions treating senior active judges as part time judges.
Citations and references
New Hampshire Code of Judicial Conduct: Sections 4C(2), 3E, 3E(1), 3E(1)(a); Application of the Code Sections B and C(1)(b). Statute cited: RSA 493-A:1, II.
See also
Source
- Landing page: New Hampshire Advisory Committee on Judicial Ethics opinions
- Original PDF: Opinion 2010-ACJE-02
- Archived official PDF: reviewable capture
Original opinion text
Full opinion text unavailable from the official source; see the linked source above for the complete text.
What do the rules say today, for your facts?
This opinion is from 2010. Ezel checks the current rules of professional conduct in your state against your situation and cites the rules it relies on.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace