Did Maryland's judicial ethics Canons or Rules bar a judge's spouse from legislative assistant work?
Apply this to your situation
This page answers the general question as of 1976. Ask about yours and see what the current rules of professional conduct in your state say for your facts, with citations.
Plain-English summary
A judge asked whether his wife could work as an administrative assistant to a county delegate during the 1976 legislative session.
The Committee concluded that neither the Maryland Canons nor the Rules of Judicial Ethics related in any manner to the nature of employment accepted by the judge's spouse. It therefore found those provisions did not preclude the described work.
Currency note
This opinion discusses the Maryland judicial ethics provisions in force at the time it was written. Its analysis is historical; verify the current Maryland Code of Judicial Conduct and the linked opinion before relying on a cited provision.
Common questions
Q: What work did the spouse propose to take?
A: An administrative assistant position with a county delegate during the 1976 legislative session.
Q: Did the Committee identify a Maryland judicial ethics restriction on that employment?
A: No. It said neither the Canons nor the Rules related to the spouse's employment.
Q: Did the opinion assess other employment or election laws?
A: No. Its stated conclusion concerned only the Maryland judicial ethics Canons and Rules.
Background and rules framework
The opinion addresses the scope of the Maryland Canons and Rules of Judicial Ethics as applied to a judge's spouse's employment; it cites no numbered Canon or Rule.
Citations and references
See also
Source
- Landing page: Maryland Judicial Ethics Committee opinion index
- Original PDF: Opinion 1976-03
Original opinion text
Reproduced from the official source for research purposes. The linked source is authoritative.
Maryland Judicial Ethics Committee
Opinion Request Number: 1976-03
Date of Issue: February 20, 1976
O Published Opinion G Unpublished Opinion G Unpublished Letter of Advice
Canons and Rules of Judicial Ethics Not Applicable to Judge’s Spouse
You have inquired of this Committee whether the Maryland Canons or Rules of Judicial Ethics will preclude the employment of your wife as Administrative Assistant to Delegate X, of the Y County delegation, during the Legislative Session of 1976.
The Committee has considered your request and is of the opinion that neither the Canons nor the Rules relate in any manner to the nature of the employment accepted by the [spouse] of a judge.
What do the rules say today, for your facts?
This opinion is from 1976. Ezel checks the current rules of professional conduct in your state against your situation and cites the rules it relies on.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace