Could an Illinois family judge serve on a nonprofit board promoting responsible fatherhood?

Short answer Yes, on the stated facts, because the group did not advocate in court, take political positions, solicit through the judge, or interfere with judicial duties; the former Code’s other restrictions still applied.
Bar
JUDICIAL-IL
Issued
July 29, 2005

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 2005. Ask about yours and see what the current rules of professional conduct in your state say for your facts, with citations.

Disclaimer: Advisory only. Not binding precedent.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official ethics opinion. The original opinion (linked on this page) is the authoritative source for any reliance.

Plain-English summary

A family judge was invited to join a nonprofit board promoting responsible fatherhood. The group did not advocate for fathers in court, offer court services, or take political positions; the judge would not solicit support, and board meetings were held in the evening.

The Committee found that the stated facts satisfied former Rule 65B’s limits on civic and charitable board service. It saw no indicated court proceedings, conflict with judicial duties, fundraising through the judge, or adverse effect on impartiality.

The opinion said permission under Rule 65B did not displace former Rules 61 and 62, which governed judicial integrity, public confidence, and lending office prestige to private interests. Nothing presented suggested those rules would be violated.

Currency note

The Committee’s page states that this opinion interprets the 1993 Illinois Code of Judicial Conduct, which was superseded on January 1, 2023. It does not assess whether the 2023 Code changes the analysis. Verify the current Code before relying on it.

In practice

The Committee tied its conclusion to the group’s program-oriented work and the judge’s nonparticipation in solicitation; it distinguished groups engaged in court advocacy or proceedings.

Common questions

Q: Did the organization’s focus on fathers itself bar the judge?

A: No. The Committee described its programs as service oriented rather than partisan or legal advocacy.

Q: Could the judge solicit funds for the group?

A: No. The stated facts excluded personal solicitation and use of the judge’s name for that purpose.

Q: Was Rule 65B the only applicable rule?

A: No. The opinion also considered former Rules 61 and 62.

Background and rules framework

The Committee applied former Illinois Supreme Court Rules 61, 62, and 65B, including the Rule 65B restrictions on judicial roles in civic organizations. It discussed IJEC Opinion 97-13 and other committee opinions about nonprofit board service.

Citations and references

  • Illinois Supreme Court Rules 61, 62A, 62B, and 65B.
  • IJEC Opinions 97-3, 97-13, 97-15, 98-1, 98-5, 99-4, 00-1, and 01-10.

See also

Source

What do the rules say today, for your facts?

This opinion is from 2005. Ezel checks the current rules of professional conduct in your state against your situation and cites the rules it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace