Could an Illinois judge personally request money or administrative help for a judicial education organization?

Short answer No. The Committee treated requests for labor or office equipment as direct financial solicitation, alongside cash requests, and barred both under former Rule 64C.
Bar
JUDICIAL-IL
Issued
July 29, 2005

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 2005. Ask about yours and see what the current rules of professional conduct in your state say for your facts, with citations.

Disclaimer: Advisory only. Not binding precedent.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official ethics opinion. The original opinion (linked on this page) is the authoritative source for any reliance.

Plain-English summary

A judge served on the executive committee of a national nonprofit organization of appellate judges that offered judicial education. The judge proposed asking other nonprofits for money or administrative support.

The Committee said former Rule 64C allowed membership and participation in fundraising for an organization devoted to improving the administration of justice, but prohibited personal solicitation of funds.

It treated requests for borrowed labor or office equipment as requests for financial contributions in kind. The judge therefore could not personally solicit either cash or administrative support.

Currency note

The Committee’s page states that this opinion interprets the 1993 Illinois Code of Judicial Conduct, which was superseded on January 1, 2023. It does not assess whether the 2023 Code changes the analysis. Verify the current Code before relying on it.

In practice

The opinion distinguished participation in fundraising, such as planning or attendance, from the judge’s direct request to a prospective donor.

Common questions

Q: Could the judge request office equipment instead of money?

A: No. The Committee treated borrowed equipment as financial support in kind.

Q: Could the judge participate in fundraising without personally soliciting?

A: Yes. The opinion said participation in fundraising was allowed under former Rule 64C.

Q: Did the judicial education purpose change the ban?

A: No. The group qualified as an administration-of-justice organization, but the personal-solicitation limit still applied.

Background and rules framework

The Committee applied former Illinois Supreme Court Rule 64C and discussed IJEC Opinions 94-9 and 95-22 on a judge’s fundraising participation and personal solicitation.

Citations and references

  • Illinois Supreme Court Rule 64C.
  • IJEC Opinions 94-9 and 95-22.

See also

Source

What do the rules say today, for your facts?

This opinion is from 2005. Ezel checks the current rules of professional conduct in your state against your situation and cites the rules it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace