May a judge lease office space to the county school superintendent?

Short answer Opinion 93-485 allows the proposed lease but requires nonremittable recusal from any case involving the county board of education because the lease creates a landlord-tenant relationship.
Bar
JUDICIAL-AL
Issued
June 25, 1993

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1993. Ask about yours and see what the current rules of professional conduct in your state say for your facts, with citations.

Disclaimer: Advisory only. Not binding precedent.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official ethics opinion. The original opinion (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ethics opinion (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The judge proposed renting space in a small building to the county school superintendent for book storage. The Commission said the lease itself was not prohibited by the Canons.

Because the lease would create a landlord-tenant relationship, the judge would have to disqualify from every case in which the county board of education was a party. The opinion says Canon 3D did not permit remission of that disqualification.

Currency note

This opinion was issued in 1993, after the Alabama Supreme Court's 1975 adoption of the Alabama Canons of Judicial Ethics. Subsequent amendments or later opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context and verify the current Canons and linked opinion before relying on its conclusions.

Common questions

Q: Was the lease itself forbidden?

A: No. The Commission found no Canon prohibition on the described arrangement.

Q: What cases would require recusal?

A: Any case in which the county board of education was a party.

Q: Could the parties remit that recusal?

A: No. The opinion says the disqualification could not be remitted.

Background and rules framework

The opinion applies Canon 3C(1) to the landlord-tenant relationship and Canon 3D to remission.

Citations and references

Alabama Canons of Judicial Ethics:

  • Canon 3C(1), Canon 3D.

Other opinions cited:

  • Alabama JIC Opinion 91-432 is cited on landlord-tenant disqualification.

See also

Source

Original opinion text

Reproduced from the official source for research purposes. The linked source is authoritative.

93-485
Judicial Inquiry Commission
800 SOUTH MCDONOUGH STREET
SUITE 201
MONTGOMERY, ALABAMA 36104
June 25, 1993
This is in response to your request for an advisory opinion from the Alabama Judicial Inquiry Commission. Your request is: May you rent or lease office space in a small building owned by you to the superintendent of the county school system for book storage. It is the opinion of this Commission that the Alabama Canons of Judicial Ethics do not prohibit the type of leasing arrangement proposed. However, because such an arrangement would create a landlord-tenant relationship, you would be required, under Canon 3C(l), to disqualify yourself in any case in which the Clay County Board of Education was a party. See Advisory Opinion 91-432. Under Canon 3D, this disqualification could not be remitted. This opinion has been reviewed and approved by the Judicial Inquiry Commission and is adopted as the opinion of the entire Commission.

What do the rules say today, for your facts?

This opinion is from 1993. Ezel checks the current rules of professional conduct in your state against your situation and cites the rules it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace