May a district or circuit judge serve as a delegate to a national political convention?

Short answer The Commission reaffirmed that delegate service was discouraged but not prohibited under Canon 7, with caution against interference with judicial duties or harm to judicial integrity.
Bar
JUDICIAL-AL
Issued
January 30, 1984

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1984. Ask about yours and see what the current rules of professional conduct in your state say for your facts, with citations.

Disclaimer: Advisory only. Not binding precedent.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official ethics opinion. The original opinion (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ethics opinion (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The question was whether a judge could run for and serve as a delegate to a national political convention.

The Commission reaffirmed Opinion 78-46: Canon 7 discouraged but did not prohibit delegate service. It repeated the caution that political activity must not interfere with judicial duties or reflect adversely on the judiciary’s integrity, impartiality, or independence, and applied the earlier opinion to district and circuit judges.

Currency note

This opinion was issued in 1984, after the Alabama Supreme Court’s 1975 adoption of the Alabama Canons of Judicial Ethics. Subsequent amendments or later opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context and verify the current Canons and linked opinion before relying on its conclusions.

Common questions

Q: Was delegate service prohibited?

A: No. The Commission said it was discouraged but not prohibited.

Q: Did the holding apply to district judges?

A: Yes. The Commission expressly applied Opinion 78-46 to district as well as circuit judges.

Background and rules framework

The opinion applies Canon 7 of the Alabama Canons of Judicial Ethics and reaffirms Alabama JIC Opinion 78-46 on convention delegation.

Citations and references

Alabama Canons of Judicial Ethics:

  • Canon 7

Other opinions cited:

  • Alabama JIC Opinion 78-46, service as national convention delegate.

See also

Source

Original opinion text

Reproduced from the official source for research purposes. The linked source is authoritative.

84-202
Judicial Inquiry Commission
800 SOUTH MCDONOUGH STREET
SUITE 201
MONTGOMERY, ALABAMA 36104
January 30, 1984
The Judicial Inquiry Commission has considered your request for an opinion concerning whether a judge may run for and, if elected, serve as a delegate to a national political convention. Your question has been answered previously by the Commission in Opinion No. 78-46. There the Commission held that service as a delegate to a national convention was discouraged but not prohibited under Canon 7 of the Alabama Canons of Judicial Ethics. The Commission further admonished that if a judge should engage in such political activity, he must be extremely cautious so that his conduct does not in any way interfere with his judicial duties or reflect adversely on the integrity, impartiality or independence of the judiciary. A copy of that opinion is enclosed for your convenience. Opinion 78-46 is hereby reaffirmed and applied to District as well as Circuit Court Judges. Yours very truly, JUDICIAL INQUIRY COMMISSION

What do the rules say today, for your facts?

This opinion is from 1984. Ezel checks the current rules of professional conduct in your state against your situation and cites the rules it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace