Can a lawyer suing a former client for unpaid fees act as both advocate and witness, and can a firm colleague handle the case instead?
Apply this to your situation
This page answers the general question as of 1993. Ezel answers yours: whether it's allowed on your facts, under the current Illinois Rules of Professional Conduct, with citations.
Plain-English summary
An attorney sued a former client to collect fees owed for matters the attorney and his firm had handled, and the attorney and firm members would be called as witnesses for one or both sides. The inquiry asked whether the attorney could represent himself and his firm while also being a witness, and whether another firm attorney who performed no services for the client could represent the firm in the fee suit.
The opinion concluded that Rule 3.7(a)(3) specifically allows a lawyer to act as advocate and to testify when the testimony relates to the nature and value of legal services rendered in the case to the client. It further concluded that, where the attorney sues for fees, the "client" is the attorney himself or his firm, so Rule 3.7(a)'s general bar on accepting employment where the lawyer may be called as a witness does not apply, because suing on one's own behalf is not "acceptance of employment" as the rule uses that term.
The opinion concluded that another attorney in the firm who performed no services for the client may represent the firm in the fee action so long as there is no conflict.
Currency note
This opinion was issued in 1993, before Illinois adopted the 2010 Illinois Rules of Professional Conduct. The ISBA Board of Governors affirmed the opinion in May 2010 as generally consistent with the 2010 Rules (referring to Rule 3.7(a)(2) and (b) with its Comment [3]), while noting the specific standards referenced may differ from the 2010 Rules. Subsequent rule amendments or later opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current guidance. Verify against current rules before relying on any specific rule or requirement mentioned here.
Common questions
Q: Can a lawyer be both advocate and witness in a suit to collect his own fees?
A: The opinion concluded he may, because a fee suit is an express exception under Rule 3.7, where testimony about the nature and value of the legal services is permitted.
Q: Why doesn't the usual advocate-witness bar apply?
A: The opinion concluded that when the lawyer sues for his own fees, the "client" is the lawyer or firm, so the rule's bar on accepting employment where the lawyer may be a witness does not apply.
Q: Can a colleague in the firm handle the fee suit instead?
A: The opinion concluded another firm member who did no work for the client may represent the firm in the action so long as there is no conflict.
Background and rules framework
The opinion interpreted Rule 3.7 (lawyer as witness), specifically the 3.7(a)(3) exception for testimony about the nature and value of legal services, and subsections (b) and (c) on firm members serving as advocate (Model Rule 3.7).
Citations and references
Rules of Professional Conduct:
- Model Rule 3.7 (lawyer as witness) / Illinois Rule 3.7(a)(3), (b), (c)
See also
- ISBA Ethics Op. 93-07: Representing a Plaintiff and Testifying to Conversations
- ISBA Ethics Op. 11-05: Lawyer Likely to Be Disqualified as a Necessary Witness
- ISBA Ethics Op. 94-10: Disclosing Confidences to Defend or Collect a Fee
Source
- Landing page: https://www.isba.org/ethics/opinions/9213
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read a 1993 opinion on this question. Ezel checks the current Illinois Rules of Professional Conduct and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the rules it relies on.