Ezel / Ethics Opinions / ISBA
ISBA 2020

Can a law firm give an unlicensed law school graduate first-year associate work before they pass the bar?

Short answer: Yes. A supervised law school graduate awaiting admission may do most first-year associate work, except appearing in a legal proceeding, as long as neither the graduate nor the firm misrepresents the graduate's unlicensed status.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 2020. Ezel answers yours: whether it's allowed on your facts, under the current Illinois Rules of Professional Conduct, with citations.

Currency note: this opinion is from 2020
Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later opinions or rule amendments may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.
Disclaimer: Advisory only. Not binding precedent.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official ethics opinion. The original opinion (linked on this page) is the authoritative source for any reliance.

Plain-English summary

The opinion addresses a firm that hired a law school graduate expecting them to sit for the bar and join as an associate, but whose admission was delayed (the question arose during the COVID-19 bar-exam postponements). The committee concludes that the firm may give the graduate, under partner supervision, most of the work it would give a first-year associate.

A graduate not yet admitted is not licensed and may not practice law: no representing a client in a proceeding, appearing in court, or taking depositions, and a lawyer may not assist that unauthorized practice under Rule 5.5(a). But Comment 2 to Rule 5.5 and Rule 5.3 let a lawyer delegate work to nonlawyer assistants (including a law graduate) so long as the lawyer supervises the delegated work and retains responsibility for the work product. The committee lists permitted tasks: legal and factual research, drafting documents and pleadings for a lawyer's signature, interviewing witnesses and clients, and offering legal conclusions under a lawyer's supervision.

The committee adds a candor limit: the firm and graduate must not make false or misleading statements about the graduate's status. The graduate must not be identified or hold themselves out as a licensed lawyer or sign documents as a lawyer, and any inclusion on firm letterhead must not be misleading (citing ISBA Opinion 87-1). The committee notes its conclusion aligns with opinions from Pennsylvania, Iowa, and South Carolina.

In practice

Under this opinion, a firm that supervises an unadmitted graduate and keeps a licensed lawyer responsible for the work product may assign that graduate the research, drafting, and client- and witness-interview work a first-year associate handles. The opinion treats appearing in a legal proceeding and otherwise practicing law as off limits, and it treats any representation of the graduate as a licensed lawyer (on letterhead, in correspondence, or in signatures) as a separate violation regardless of the supervision.

Common questions

Q: Can a law firm employ a law graduate who has not yet passed the bar?

A: Yes. The opinion treats an unadmitted graduate as a nonlawyer assistant under Rule 5.3, whose work a lawyer may use and delegate, provided the lawyer supervises it and keeps responsibility for the work product.

Q: What work can the graduate not do?

A: The graduate may not represent a client in a legal proceeding, appear in court, or take depositions, and may not otherwise engage in the practice of law; the supervising lawyer may not assist that unauthorized practice under Rule 5.5(a).

Q: Can the graduate sign letters or appear on firm letterhead?

A: The opinion says any communication about the graduate's status must not be false or misleading. The graduate must not sign as a lawyer or be held out as one, and letterhead listing the graduate must not mislead (citing ISBA Opinion 87-1).

Q: Who is responsible if the graduate's work is wrong?

A: The supervising licensed lawyer. The opinion says that lawyer must undertake adequate supervision and is responsible for the work product, consistent with the Rule 5.1 and 5.3 supervisory duties.

Background and rules framework

The opinion applies Illinois Rule of Professional Conduct 5.5 (unauthorized practice; a lawyer may not assist a nonlawyer in it), with Comment 2 permitting delegation to paraprofessionals under supervision, and Rule 5.3 (responsibilities regarding nonlawyer assistants), read alongside the Rule 5.1 supervisory standard. Rule 8.4(a) bars violating the rules through the acts of another. These track the corresponding Model Rules 5.1, 5.3, 5.5, and 8.4(a). The opinion also flags that, at the time, Illinois Supreme Court Rule 711's authorization for supervised graduate practice reached only legal-aid, public-defender, and government-office settings, not private-sector employment.

Citations and references

Rules of Professional Conduct:

  • MR 5.5 / IL RPC 5.5 (assisting unauthorized practice; Comment 2 delegation)
  • MR 5.3 / IL RPC 5.3 (responsibilities regarding nonlawyer assistants)
  • MR 5.1 / IL RPC 5.1 (supervisory responsibilities)
  • MR 8.4(a) / IL RPC 8.4(a) (violation through the acts of another)

Court rules:

  • Ill. S. Ct. R. 711 (supervised practice by graduates, limited settings)

Other opinions cited:

  • ISBA Advisory Opinion 87-1 (lay employees on firm letterhead)
  • ISBA Advisory Opinion 03-07 (supervision of nonlawyer assistants)
  • Pennsylvania Bar Op. 86-97; Iowa Bar Op. 94-26; South Carolina Bar Op. 90-25

See also

Source

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 2020 opinion on this question. Ezel checks the current Illinois Rules of Professional Conduct and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the rules it relies on.