FLBAR February 15, 1968

Can a lawyer use a postage meter that prints a short slogan alongside the postage?

Short answer: The opinion concluded that there was no ethical objection to a lawyer using a postage meter imprinting the message 'Law, Rule of Right, Not Might.'

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1968. Ezel answers yours: whether it's allowed on your facts, under the current Florida Rules of Professional Conduct, with citations.

Currency note: this opinion is from 1968
Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later opinions or rule amendments may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.
Disclaimer: Advisory only. Not binding precedent.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official ethics opinion. The original opinion (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ethics opinion (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The committee was asked whether a lawyer could use, in his office, a postage meter that printed the message "Law, Rule of Right, Not Might" in conjunction with the postage stamp. The committee found no ethical objection to that use.

Currency note

This opinion was issued in 1968, before The Florida Bar's adoption of the 2006 revisions to the Rules of Professional Conduct, and before the 1977 Bates v. State Bar of Arizona decision reshaped lawyer-advertising restrictions. It applied the former Canon 27 on advertising. Advertising of legal services is now addressed by the rules at Rule 4-7.11 and following. Treat this page as historical context, not current guidance. Verify against the current rules before relying on any specific requirement mentioned here.

Common questions

Q: Could a lawyer print a slogan on metered office mail?

A: Under this opinion, yes. The committee found no ethical objection to a postage meter imprinting the message "Law, Rule of Right, Not Might" on the lawyer's office mail.

Q: What rule did the committee apply?

A: The committee analyzed the question under the former Canon 27 on advertising; the opinion's header cross-references current Rule 4-7.11.

Background and rules framework

The opinion applied the former Canon 27, which governed lawyer advertising and publicity. Advertising of legal services is now addressed by the advertising rules of the Rules Regulating The Florida Bar beginning at Rule 4-7.11; the Model Rule analogue is Rule 7.1.

Citations and references

Rules of Professional Conduct:

  • Canon 27 [Canons of Professional Ethics; see current Rule 4-7.11]

See also

Source

Original opinion text

Reproduced from the official source for research purposes. The linked source is authoritative.

FLORIDA BAR ETHICS OPINION
OPINION 68-1
February 15, 1968
Advisory ethics opinions are not binding.
There is no ethical objection to the use by a member of The Florida Bar of a postage meter imprinting a message reading "Law, Rule of Right, Not Might."
Canon: 27 [See current 4-7.11]
Chairman MacDonald stated the opinion of the committee:
The Committee finds no ethical objection to the use by a member of The Florida Bar in his office of a postage meter utilizing in conjunction with the postage stamp a message reading "Law, Rule of Right, Not Might."

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 1968 opinion on this question. Ezel checks the current Florida Rules of Professional Conduct and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the rules it relies on.