FLBAR June 22, 1964

Can a law firm obtain Florida Bar pamphlets for a savings and loan association to display and distribute to the public?

Short answer: Yes. The committee found nothing improper in a firm securing copies of a Florida Bar will pamphlet for a savings and loan association to display and distribute to the public, and commended the practice.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1964. Ezel answers yours: whether it's allowed on your facts, under the current Florida Rules of Professional Conduct, with citations.

Currency note: this opinion is from 1964
Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later opinions or rule amendments may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.
Disclaimer: Advisory only. Not binding precedent.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official ethics opinion. The original opinion (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ethics opinion (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A member reported that a federal savings and loan association had asked his firm to procure, for display and distribution in the association's building, copies of The Florida Bar pamphlet titled "Have You Made A Will?". The association wanted to make the pamphlet available to members of the public who asked about will-preparation problems.

The committee was unanimously of the opinion that there was nothing improper in the firm securing the pamphlets as planned, and nothing improper in the savings and loan association displaying and distributing them. The committee in fact commended the practice to members of the Bar.

Currency note

This opinion was issued in 1964, before The Florida Bar's adoption of the 2006 revisions to the Rules of Professional Conduct, and before the United States Supreme Court's decision in Bates v. State Bar of Arizona, 433 U.S. 350 (1977), which recognized constitutional protection for truthful lawyer advertising and reshaped this area. The opinion applied former Canons 27 and 35 of the Canons of Professional Ethics; the distribution of public information about legal services is now addressed by Rule 4-7.11 (and related advertising rules) and a lawyer's professional independence by Rule 4-5.4 of the Rules Regulating The Florida Bar (Model Rules 7.2 and 5.4). Subsequent rule amendments or later opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current guidance. Verify against the current rules before relying on any specific requirement mentioned here.

Common questions

Q: Could a firm supply Bar-published public-education pamphlets to a business for distribution?

A: Yes. The committee found nothing improper in a firm securing The Florida Bar's will pamphlet for a savings and loan association to display and distribute, and it commended the practice.

Q: Was it improper for the savings and loan association itself to hand out the pamphlets?

A: No. The committee found nothing improper in the association displaying and distributing the pamphlets to members of the public who asked about will questions.

Background and rules framework

The opinion applied former Canon 27 (advertising) and Canon 35 (professional independence and lay intermediaries) of the Canons of Professional Ethics. The Bar's own annotation directs the reader to current Rule 4-7.11. Distribution of impersonal public-education material published by the Bar itself is now addressed by Rule 4-7.11 and related advertising rules, and the professional-independence concern by Rule 4-5.4 of the Rules Regulating The Florida Bar (Model Rules 7.2 and 5.4). The pamphlet here was the Bar's own publication, not material naming or promoting the inquiring firm.

Citations and references

Rules of Professional Conduct:

  • Canons 27, 35 [Canons of Professional Ethics; advertising; professional independence and lay intermediaries; see current Rules 4-7.11, 4-5.4]

See also

Source

Original opinion text

Reproduced from the official source for research purposes. The linked source is authoritative.

FLORIDA BAR ETHICS OPINION
OPINION 64-32
June 22, 1964
Advisory ethics opinions are not binding.
There is nothing improper in a law firm securing copies of pamphlets published by The Florida Bar for a savings association and nothing improper in the displaying and distributing of such pamphlets by the association.
Canons: 27, 35 [See current 4-7.11]
Chairman Smith stated the opinion of the committee:
A member of The Florida Bar states that a federal savings and loan association has asked his firm to procure for display and distribution in its building copies of The Florida Bar pamphlet entitled "Have You Made A Will?". The association wishes to make the pamphlet available to members of the public who ask about problems relating to the preparation of wills.
This Committee is unanimously of the opinion that there would be nothing improper in the firm securing the pamphlets as planned and nothing improper in the savings and loan association displaying and distributing the pamphlets. The Committee, in fact, commends the practice to members of the Bar.

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 1964 opinion on this question. Ezel checks the current Florida Rules of Professional Conduct and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the rules it relies on.