DBHAWAII December 11, 1992

Can a lawyer charge interest on a client's unpaid balance for legal fees or costs?

Short answer: The opinion concluded that an attorney may ethically charge interest on unpaid balances for legal services rendered or costs incurred, to the extent permitted by law. It superseded Formal Opinion No. 75-3-3 (1975).

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1992. Ezel answers yours: whether it's allowed on your facts, under the current Hawaii Rules of Professional Conduct, with citations.

Currency note: this opinion is from 1992
Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later opinions or rule amendments may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.
Disclaimer: Advisory only. Not binding precedent.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official ethics opinion. The original opinion (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ethics opinion (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The opinion addressed whether an attorney may charge interest on a client's outstanding account. It concluded that an attorney may ethically charge interest on unpaid balances for legal services rendered or costs incurred, to the extent permitted by law.

The opinion stated that it superseded Formal Opinion No. 75-3-3 (1975).

Currency note

This opinion was issued in 1992, before the Hawaii Supreme Court's adoption of the current Hawaii Rules of Professional Conduct (the HRPC took effect in 1994 and were substantially revised in 2014). Subsequent rule amendments or later opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current guidance. Verify against current rules before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or requirement mentioned here.

Common questions

Q: Can a Hawaii lawyer charge interest on a client's unpaid bill?

A: The opinion concluded that an attorney may ethically charge interest on unpaid balances for legal services rendered or costs incurred, to the extent permitted by law.

Q: Did this opinion change earlier guidance?

A: Yes. The opinion stated that it superseded Formal Opinion No. 75-3-3 (1975).

Citations and references

Other opinions cited:

  • Formal Opinion No. 75-3-3 (1975): superseded by this opinion.

See also

Source

Original opinion text

Best-effort transcription from a scanned PDF. Minor errors may remain; the linked PDF is authoritative.

Office of Disciplinary Counsel
Supreme Court, State of Hawaii
1164 Bishop Street, Suite 600
Honolulu, Hawaii 96813
Telephone (808) 521-4591

FORMAL OPINION NO. 32

An attorney may ethically charge interest on unpaid balances for legal services rendered or costs incurred to the extent permitted by law.

This Opinion hereby supersedes Formal Opinion No. 75-3-3 (1975).

DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, December 11, 1992.

Dwight M. Rush
Chairperson, Disciplinary Board

Gerald H. Kibe
Chief Disciplinary Counsel

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 1992 opinion on this question. Ezel checks the current Hawaii Rules of Professional Conduct and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the rules it relies on.