Burdeau v. McDowell
Is it still good law? What later courts have actually done to this case.
Status
More on how this was screened
Other citing courts continued to apply Burdeau's rule that the Fourth Amendment does not restrict independent private searches.
45 later cases cite Burdeau v. McDowell; 45 of those citations sat close to treatment language and were flagged for reading, and all of them have been read. Citations that did not sit near treatment language were not flagged and were not read one by one, so a court that weakened this case without using any of that language would not appear here.
Relying on Burdeau v. McDowell?
This page shows what later courts did to it. Ask about your specific facts and see whether it still carries your argument, with citations you can check.
Treatments
Questioned
-
The district court questioned Burdeau when it upheld the FBI's objection to authenticating documents stolen from its offices for use in a civil rights action.
Kenyatta v. Kelly · United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania · filed
I question the validity of the Burdeau case in the light of the law’s developments over the last 53 years and decline to follow it.
Read the full opinion on CourtListener →
Does this case still carry your argument?
Describe your facts. Ezel reads Burdeau v. McDowell and the cases that treated it, then tells you whether it still holds for your situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace