Connolly v. Union Sewer Pipe Co.
Is it still good law? What later courts have actually done to this case.
Status
More on how this was screened
The Supreme Court later described that ruling as “overruled by Tigner.” Connolly's separate rule that a buyer must pay for goods despite the seller's unlawful combination continued to be applied. The Constitution Annotated lists Tigner as the overruling decision.
20 citations to Connolly v. Union Sewer Pipe Co. sat close to treatment language and were flagged for reading, and all of them have been read. Citations that did not sit near treatment language were not flagged and were not read one by one, so a court that weakened this case without using any of that language would not appear here.
Relying on Connolly v. Union Sewer Pipe Co.?
This page shows what later courts did to it. Ask about your specific facts and see whether it still carries your argument, with citations you can check.
Treatments
Overruled
-
The Supreme Court rejected Connolly's rule that an antitrust exemption for agricultural producers violated equal protection.
Tigner v. Texas · Supreme Court of the United States · filed
And so we conclude that to write into law the differences between agriculture and other economic pursuits was within the power of the Texas legislature. Connolly’s case has been worn away by the erosion of time, and we are of opinion that it is no longer controlling.
Read the full opinion on CourtListener →
Does this case still carry your argument?
Describe your facts. Ezel reads Connolly v. Union Sewer Pipe Co. and the cases that treated it, then tells you whether it still holds for your situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace